Moore v. Apollo Health & Beauty Care

2017 ONCA 383 (CanLII)Court of Appeal for OntarioDecided Constructive dismissal

Moore v. Apollo: Constructive Dismissal & Self-Rep

Summary

This is an appeal from a trial decision involving a self-represented litigant who alleged constructive dismissal and sought unpaid wages, statutory holidays, and sick days. The Court of Appeal addressed whether the trial judge erred by finding the appellant had abandoned these claims and whether the judge fulfilled their duty to ensure trial fairness for a self-represented party. The appeal also considered whether contractual notice provisions limiting entitlements to statutory minimums remained enforceable following a constructive dismissal.

Outcome

appeal allowed in part

Key Factors

  • constructive dismissal
  • self-represented litigant
  • trial fairness
  • abandonment of claims
  • notice provisions

Related Cases

Taylor v. Salytics Inc.

2026 ONCA 621 (CanLII) · 2026-09-03

Taylor v. Salytics: Constructive Dismissal Appeal

The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed an appeal challenging a ruling that a temporary lay-off clause was not a termination clause under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court addressed whether the lay-off constituted constructive dismissal at common law and interpreted the employment agreement's substance over form, confirming that the clause incorporated ESA requirements.

Faragher v. ProRich Seeds (2016) Inc.

2026 ONSC 4161 (CanLII) · 2026-07-16

Constructive Dismissal: Dependent Contractor Awarded 21 Months Notice

This case addresses whether a salesperson was an employee, independent contractor, or dependent contractor, ultimately finding dependent contractor status. The court held that the employer's unilateral withholding of a long-standing monthly advance constituted constructive dismissal, entitling the plaintiff to reasonable notice.

Nielson v. Township of Morley

2026 ONSC 3772 (CanLII) · 2026-06-26

Constructive Dismissal: Potter Test Applied

This wrongful dismissal case addressed whether the Township of Morley's actions constituted a constructive dismissal of the employee. The court found that the employer did not unilaterally change an essential term of the contract and that a reasonable employee would have persevered, thus constructive dismissal was not established. Consequently, the claim for damages was dismissed, although an alternative assessment of notice was noted as one year reduced to six months had liability been found.

Flegg v. Sigma Lithium Corporation

2026 ONSC 2596 (CanLII) · 2026-05-01

Constructive Dismissal: Damages for Unilateral Modifications

This case addresses whether unilateral modifications to duties and marginalization amounted to constructive dismissal, applying the Bardol factors to determine reasonable notice. The court found constructive dismissal established and awarded damages in lieu of notice, along with aggravated and punitive damages due to the employer's egregious conduct.

Smith v. Rotalec Canada Inc.

2026 ONSC 2310 (CanLII) · 2026-04-20

Employment: Leave to Amend Pleadings for Corporate Veil

This is a procedural ruling on a motion to amend pleadings in an employment law action involving constructive dismissal and unpaid commissions. The court granted leave to add corporate veil allegations against a directing mind, finding that a reasonable cause of action was disclosed and that the amendments were not time-barred under the Limitations Act, 2002.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.