L. v. Crew Group Inc.
Employment Standards: Joint Employer Liability for Unpaid Wages
Summary
A merits decision involving a homeworker seeking to hold retailers and manufacturers jointly and severally liable for unpaid wages under section 12 of the Employment Standards Act (ESA). The court examined whether section 12 applies to vertically integrated industries and whether the businesses were associated or related with the intent to defeat the ESA's purpose. The court found no evidence of such relationships and ruled that the retailers and manufacturers were not liable for the subcontractor's non-compliance.
Outcome
Retailers and manufacturers not liable for subcontractor's non-compliance
Key Factors
- joint employer liability
- Employment Standards Act
- section 12 ESA
- associated or related businesses
- civil procedure jurisdiction
Related Cases
P. v. Zenova Group PLC
2026 ONCA 549 (CanLII) · 2026-07-29P. v. Zenova: Employment Status & Jurisdiction Appeal
This is an appeal from a motion judge's decision regarding employment status and jurisdiction. The Court of Appeal found that the appellant was an employee under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, rendering the forum selection clause void, and established that Ontario had jurisdiction over the dispute.
2469695 Ontario Inc. v. M.
2025 ONSC 5237 (CanLII) · 2025-09-17Judicial Review: Unpaid Wages & Employment Status
This is a judicial review of an Ontario Labour Relations Board decision that upheld orders for unpaid wages issued by an employment standards officer. The Divisional Court applied the Vavilov framework to determine whether the Board's decision regarding the respondents' employment status was reasonable, assessing the Board's reliance on documentary evidence and whether procedural fairness was breached despite allegations of witness coaching.
C. v. Medcan Health Management Inc.
2025 ONSC 2902 (CanLII) · 2025-05-14ESA Class Action: Vacation & Holiday Pay Compliance
This is a class action proceeding addressing whether the defendant maintained a reasonable system to ensure proper payment of statutory vacation and public holiday pay under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court is determining common issues related to ESA compliance, breach of employment contracts, and the scope of discovery and document production relevant to these statutory obligations.
D. v. Transasian Fine Cars Ltd.
2025 ONSC 7382 (CanLII) · 2025-03-25ESA Termination & Severance: Frustration of Contract
This is an interlocutory application concerning the calculation of termination pay and severance pay under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, following a frustration of contract due to disability. The court addressed whether 'regular wages' for these statutory entitlements should be based on pre-injury earnings or the accommodated reduced-rate earnings from the last 12 weeks worked. The application was dismissed, with the court applying a plain reading of the statute and precedent from Hoekstra v. Rehability to calculate payments based on the last 12 weeks worked.
In the Matter of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act and a Plan of Compromise or Arrangement of 14487893 Canada Inc.
2024 ONSC 5220 (CanLII) · 2024-09-20A contractual dispute involving the interpretation of insurance exclusion clauses and the Employment Standards Act.
More Ontario employment decisions from 2001
This summary was written by AI from the published decision and its headnote. It is not an official version of the decision; read the full text on CanLII before relying on it. This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.