Ontario Severance

P. v. Toronto Stock Exchange et al.

1965 CanLII 32 (ON CA)Court of Appeal for OntarioDecided Termination

P. v. Toronto Stock Exchange: Employment Termination Appeal

Summary

An appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario regarding the Toronto Stock Exchange's disciplinary actions against an appellant who was terminated from his position as a director, shareholder, and employee of a member firm. The court addressed whether the Exchange acted within its by-laws, induced a breach of contract, or violated natural justice in its disciplinary proceedings. The Exchange's authority was upheld and procedural fairness was satisfied through a second hearing. This decision was appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which upheld it (P. v. Toronto Stock Exchange et al., [1968] SCR 330). The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal, holding that the Board of Governors of the Toronto Stock Exchange acted in good faith and in accordance with natural justice. The trial judgment dismissing the appellant's action stands.

Key Factors

  • employment termination
  • disciplinary actions
  • natural justice
  • fiduciary duty
  • inducing breach of contract

Related Cases

N. v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario

2026 ONSC 5520 (CanLII) · 2026-10-01

N. v. LCBO: Judicial Review of Termination Dismissed

This is a judicial review application concerning the termination of an employee by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. The applicant sought to challenge the termination as an exercise of statutory power, but the Divisional Court found no jurisdiction for judicial review, noting the dispute was governed by a collective agreement and subject to grievance arbitration. The application was dismissed as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process.

H. v. Cronos Group Inc.

2026 ONSC 5231 (CanLII) · 2026-09-16

H. v. Cronos Group Inc. - Summary Judgment Dismissed

This is a procedural ruling on a motion for summary judgment in an employment dispute concerning stock options and termination agreements. The court dismissed the motion, finding that genuine issues for trial existed regarding the value of unexercised options, equitable set-off, and limitation periods, necessitating a full trial.

B. v. Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.

2026 ONCA 568 (CanLII) · 2026-08-06

Ontario CA: Termination Clause Enforceability Under ESA

The Court of Appeal for Ontario heard appeals regarding the enforceability of termination clauses in employment contracts under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court addressed whether phrases like 'at any time' and 'for any reason' invalidate without cause termination provisions and whether 'just cause' definitions broader than 'wilful misconduct' are enforceable when minimum ESA entitlements are preserved. The court allowed the appeal in B. and dismissed the appeal in Li, confirming that referential incorporation of ESA entitlements is acceptable and declining to reconsider the Waksdale precedent.

F. v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

2026 ONSC 1855 (CanLII) · 2026-04-28

F. v. Sun Life: Jurisdiction & LTD Dismissal

This case addresses whether a dispute arising from an employee's resignation and termination falls under exclusive arbitral jurisdiction via a collective agreement or can proceed as a civil claim for negligent misrepresentation. The court also examined whether an insurer's summary judgment regarding the termination of long-term disability benefits should be granted, finding genuine issues for trial regarding policy administration and credibility.

C. v. H. et al

2026 ONSC 2194 (CanLII) · 2026-04-13

Fixed-Term Termination: Unenforceable Clauses & Liability

This case involves a determination on the enforceability of termination clauses in an employment contract and the remedies available for the early termination of a fixed-term agreement. The court found the termination provisions unenforceable due to non-compliance with minimum standards, applying principles from Waksdale v. Swegon North America. Additionally, the court confirmed the employee's entitlement to wages for the balance of the fixed term, citing Howard v. Benson Group Inc., and held individual defendants jointly and severally liable alongside the corporation following a default judgment.

More Ontario employment decisions from the 1960s

This summary was written by AI from the published decision and its headnote. It is not an official version of the decision; read the full text on CanLII before relying on it. This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.