Shedletsky v. EQ Advertising Group Ltd.
Constructive Dismissal: Furlough and Severance Appeal
Summary
This is an appeal from a motion judge's decision in a constructive dismissal case involving an employee of EQ Advertising Group Ltd. The central issue was whether a furlough due to COVID-19, accompanied by the cutoff of salary and communications, constituted constructive dismissal and triggered an accelerated severance provision in the employee's Severance Plan Agreement. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no extricable error in the motion judge's interpretation of the contract.
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Key Factors
- constructive dismissal
- furlough
- contractual interpretation
- severance plan agreement
- standard of review
Related Cases
Taylor v. Salytics Inc.
2026 ONCA 621 (CanLII) · 2026-09-03Taylor v. Salytics: Constructive Dismissal Appeal
The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed an appeal challenging a ruling that a temporary lay-off clause was not a termination clause under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court addressed whether the lay-off constituted constructive dismissal at common law and interpreted the employment agreement's substance over form, confirming that the clause incorporated ESA requirements.
Faragher v. ProRich Seeds (2016) Inc.
2026 ONSC 4161 (CanLII) · 2026-07-16Constructive Dismissal: Dependent Contractor Awarded 21 Months Notice
This case addresses whether a salesperson was an employee, independent contractor, or dependent contractor, ultimately finding dependent contractor status. The court held that the employer's unilateral withholding of a long-standing monthly advance constituted constructive dismissal, entitling the plaintiff to reasonable notice.
Nielson v. Township of Morley
2026 ONSC 3772 (CanLII) · 2026-06-26Constructive Dismissal: Potter Test Applied
This wrongful dismissal case addressed whether the Township of Morley's actions constituted a constructive dismissal of the employee. The court found that the employer did not unilaterally change an essential term of the contract and that a reasonable employee would have persevered, thus constructive dismissal was not established. Consequently, the claim for damages was dismissed, although an alternative assessment of notice was noted as one year reduced to six months had liability been found.
Flegg v. Sigma Lithium Corporation
2026 ONSC 2596 (CanLII) · 2026-05-01Constructive Dismissal: Damages for Unilateral Modifications
This case addresses whether unilateral modifications to duties and marginalization amounted to constructive dismissal, applying the Bardol factors to determine reasonable notice. The court found constructive dismissal established and awarded damages in lieu of notice, along with aggravated and punitive damages due to the employer's egregious conduct.
Smith v. Rotalec Canada Inc.
2026 ONSC 2310 (CanLII) · 2026-04-20Employment: Leave to Amend Pleadings for Corporate Veil
This is a procedural ruling on a motion to amend pleadings in an employment law action involving constructive dismissal and unpaid commissions. The court granted leave to add corporate veil allegations against a directing mind, finding that a reasonable cause of action was disclosed and that the amendments were not time-barred under the Limitations Act, 2002.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.