Maynard v. Johnson Controls Canada LP
Maynard v. Johnson Controls: Severance Pay Appeal
Summary
This is an appeal from a summary judgment decision concerning the calculation of termination pay and severance under an employment agreement. The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower court's finding that the employer's Share and Incentive Plan forfeiture provision was undisclosed and that RSUs and bonuses must be included in the para. 16 payment calculation. The court also rejected the employer's argument that the agreement limited entitlements to Employment Standards Act minimums.
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Award
summary judgment upheld; employee entitled to full para. 16 amount including RSUs and bonuses
Key Factors
- termination pay calculation
- RSU inclusion
- incentive compensation
- contract interpretation
- summary judgment
Related Cases
Khatib v. GoEasy Ltd
2026 ONSC 4238 (CanLII) · 2026-07-21Wrongful Dismissal: RSU Dividends Included in Severance
This is a post-judgment procedural ruling regarding the calculation of damages in a wrongful dismissal case. The court issued supplemental reasons to clarify that dividends flowing from a granted RSU are part of the plaintiff's Long-Term Incentive Plan award, rejecting the defendant's objection to their inclusion in the damages calculation.
1001270243 Ontario Inc.
2026 ONSC 3967 (CanLII) · 2026-07-07CCAA: ResidualCo as Former Employer under WEPPA
A procedural application in CCAA proceedings seeking declarations on whether a residual company qualifies as a 'former employer' under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA) following a reverse vesting transaction. The court determined that the residual company was the former employer and granted declarations under the relevant statutes to facilitate employee wage claims.
Wallbridge, Wallbridge v. Poupore
2026 ONCA 417 (CanLII) · 2026-06-15Post-Termination Commission & Unjust Enrichment Appeal
This is an appeal from a trial decision concerning a former employee's entitlement to post-termination compensation for fees billed and collected after departure, as well as claims for unjust enrichment and damages for breach of the duty of good faith. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, finding that the obligation to pay for files settled prior to departure survived termination, but denied entitlement for unbilled work in progress and dismissed the claim for unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed regarding the finding that the employee did not breach the duty of good faith, and the employer's damages claim was dismissed due to lack of evidence.
McCoubrey v. Salesfloor Inc.
2025 ONSC 3739 (CanLII) · 2025-06-24Unpaid Commissions: Resignation & Policy Incorporation
This case concerns a dispute over unpaid commissions owed to a former employee after her resignation. The court determined that the 2020 Commission Policy governed the plaintiff's entitlements because she did not consent to the 2021 policy changes. Applying the principle of contra proferentem to resolve ambiguities in the disbursement clause, the court found the plaintiff was the effective cause of the deals and entitled to the commissions earned before her resignation.
Brown v The Bank of Nova Scotia
2025 ONSC 323 (CanLII) · 2025-01-14Brown v Bank of Nova Scotia: Privilege in Employment Docs
This is an interlocutory motion concerning document production in an employment dispute where the plaintiff challenged the defendant's claims of solicitor-client and litigation privilege over workplace investigation documents. The court addressed whether common interest privilege applied and affirmed the defendant's search efforts, while deferring costs to avoid halting the litigation.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.