Purolator Inc. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers
Secondary Picketing as Labour Dispute
Summary
This is an appeal concerning whether secondary picketing constitutes an act in connection with a 'labour dispute' under section 102(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, thereby triggering specific procedural protections for injunctions. The Court of Appeal for Ontario addressed issues of jurisdiction, statutory interpretation, and Charter rights regarding freedom of expression and association in the context of labour disputes.
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Key Factors
- secondary picketing
- labour dispute
- Courts of Justice Act
- statutory interpretation
- Charter rights
Related Cases
Bourque/Chima v. Public Service Alliance Of Canada et al
2026 ONSC 4761 (CanLII) · 2026-08-17This is an interlocutory proceeding addressing subject matter jurisdiction in a labour relations dispute. The court dismissed the action, finding that the Labour Board has exclusive jurisdiction over the union's internal disciplinary process and allegations of procedural unfairness under the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act.
Purolator Inc. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers
2026 ONCA 515 (CanLII) · 2026-07-14Labour Dispute Injunction: CUPW v. Purolator Appeal
This is an appeal concerning the jurisdiction of a court to issue an injunction against picketing by the Canadian Union of Postal Workers at Purolator Inc. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the injunction, ruling that the employer lacked jurisdiction because proper notice under s. 102 of the Courts of Justice Act was not provided, despite the picketing being connected to a labour dispute.
Remcan Projects LP v. Wallace
2026 ONSC 3571 (CanLII) · 2026-06-17Labour Relations: Exclusive Jurisdiction & Stay of Action
This is a procedural ruling on a motion to stay a civil action and strike pleadings in a dispute concerning union organizing and certification. The court determined that the essential character of the dispute fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ontario Labour Relations Board under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, applying the Weber two-part test. Consequently, the civil action was stayed to avoid duplication and inconsistent findings, and specific tort claims were struck as non-justiciable certification harms.
Dorceus v. Ontario
2026 ONCA 321 (CanLII) · 2026-05-06Dorceus v. Ontario: Charter Claims Struck for Arbitration
This is an appeal from a motion to strike where the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and struck the pleadings. The appellants, including unionized healthcare workers and privileged hospital staff, attempted to litigate vaccine policy disputes and privilege revocations in civil court. The court held that these matters fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of labour arbitration or statutory review bodies, striking the Charter and tort claims as an abuse of process.
Formenton v. Newport Sports Management Inc. et al.
2026 ONSC 1373 (CanLII) · 2026-03-06Arbitration Award Set Aside: Labour Relations & Fairness
This is a procedural ruling on an application to set aside an arbitration award in a closed shop labour relations context. The court addressed issues of arbitrator jurisdiction, the validity of a six-month contractual limitation period, and procedural fairness regarding the arbitrator's consideration of NHLPA information.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.