Susan Shoe Industries Ltd. v. Ricciardi
Severance Pay Dispute: Res Judicata and Employment Standards Act
Summary
A merits decision involving a dispute over severance pay where an employee was awarded six months' notice under a written contract, but the court dismissed the statutory severance pay claim. The employee later received severance pay from an employment standards officer, and the case examines whether res judicata prevents reconsideration of the claim. The court also addressed whether statutory severance pay can override contractual notice provisions and the jurisdiction of employment standards officers.
Outcome
Application to quash order allowed; prior court decision deemed binding under res judicata.
Award
Employee awarded six months' notice under a written contract; statutory severance pay claim dismissed by court but later awarded by employment standards officer.
Key Factors
- severance pay
- res judicata
- Employment Standards Act
- contractual notice provisions
- statutory interpretation
Related Cases
Johnstone v. Loblaw
2025 ONSC 4755 (CanLII) · 2025-08-18Employment Dispute: Settlement Agreement and Summary Judgment
A civil procedure case involving the interpretation of a settlement agreement and the admissibility of an affidavit in an employment dispute. The court determined whether the agreement was binding and whether a release clause barred claims related to a failed house purchase. Summary judgment was deemed appropriate to resolve the dispute.
Flammia v. Royal Glen Eagle
2014 ONSC 7522 (CanLII) · 2014-12-17Severance Payments and Damages Deductibility in Employment Disputes
A case involving severance payments and their deductibility from damages for loss of income. The court considered whether severance payments should be deducted from damages for past and future loss of income, and whether these payments fall under the private insurance exception to the rule against double recovery.
Sidhu v. Affinia Canada Corporation
2010 ONSC 2829 (CanLII) · 2010-05-14Severance Agreements and Union Representation in Employment Law
A court ruled that the Superior Court did not have jurisdiction to hear disputes related to severance and termination payments under a collective agreement, affirming that such disputes must be resolved through grievance/arbitration processes. The case also addressed the union's duty of fair representation, which is also within the realm of employment law.
Davenport v. Hudson's Bay Company
2006 CanLII 31299 (ON SC) · 2006-09-11Severance Entitlements: Employee Entitled to Full RSU Payout Under Change of Control Provision
A severance entitlements case involving the interpretation of a 'change of control' provision in an employee stock option plan. The court held that the provision is clear, mandatory, and unconditional, and that it overrides the 'termination without cause' provision, entitling the employee to a full payout of restricted share units (RSUs) vested during the severance period.
Adamson v. Murray Axmith & associates Ltd.
2005 CanLII 5481 (ON SC) · 2005-03-08Severance Pay: Related Businesses and Payroll Threshold Under ESA
A severance pay case involving the interpretation of the Employment Standards Act (ESA) to determine whether the defendant and its Ontario agents constitute 'associated or related activities' and whether the combined payroll meets the $2.5 million threshold. The court applied an expansive interpretation of the ESA to treat the entities as a single employer and found the threshold was met, entitling the plaintiff to severance pay. Prejudgment interest was also awarded from the statutory due date.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.