Class action - Employment — Ontario Employment Law

78 casesDecisions from 1944–2025

About Class action - Employment

What happens when an employer's policy or practice harms not just one employee, but dozens, or even thousands? In Ontario, an employment class action provides a powerful tool for a group of workers with a common legal complaint to band together and seek justice in a single lawsuit. Instead of each employee facing the daunting task of suing a large company alone, a 'representative plaintiff' brings the case forward on behalf of the entire group, or 'class'.

Employment class actions typically arise from systemic issues where an employer has applied the same illegal practice to a large number of employees. Common examples include the widespread misclassification of employees as 'independent contractors' to avoid paying overtime and vacation pay, a systematic failure to pay for all hours worked, or illegal deductions from wages across an entire workforce. These claims often hinge on alleged violations of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) or breaches of a standard employment contract.

For a case to proceed as a class action in Ontario, it must first be 'certified' by a judge. Under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, the court must be satisfied that there is an identifiable class of two or more people, that the claims of the class members raise common issues, and that a class action is the preferable procedure for resolving those issues. Employers often challenge certification, for instance by arguing that each employee's situation is too different to be heard together, or by trying to enforce arbitration clauses in employment contracts that attempt to prohibit group lawsuits. The viability of an employment class action depends heavily on the specific facts and the commonality of the legal issue, making a thorough investigation by experienced legal counsel a critical first step.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of workplace issues can lead to an employment class action in Ontario?

Common issues include systemic unpaid overtime, misclassifying large groups of employees as independent contractors, failure to pay vacation or public holiday pay, illegal wage deductions, and widespread breaches of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 that affect many workers in the same way.

Do I have to pay legal fees to join an employment class action?

Generally, no. Most employment class actions are handled by law firms on a contingency fee basis. This means the lawyers are only paid a percentage of the total settlement or award if the case is successful, and you do not pay fees upfront.

My contract has an arbitration clause. Can I still participate in a class action?

It depends. Employers sometimes use arbitration clauses to try to prevent class actions. However, the courts may find these clauses unenforceable, especially if they block your ability to enforce your minimum rights under the ESA. This is a complex legal question that requires a lawyer's assessment.

What does it mean for a class action to be 'certified'?

Certification is the formal approval from a judge that allows a lawsuit to proceed as a class action. The judge assesses whether the case meets the legal requirements set out in Ontario's Class Proceedings Act, 1992, such as having common issues among the group.

Is there a time limit to start an employment class action?

Yes, Ontario's basic limitation period is two years from the day the claim was discovered. In a class action context, determining this date can be complex, so it is crucial to act quickly if you believe you are part of a group with a common legal complaint.

What if my employer offers me a small payment to settle the issue individually?

Be very cautious. Signing a release in exchange for a payment could disqualify you from participating in a larger class action that might result in a more significant recovery. It's wise to understand the potential for a group claim before accepting an individual offer.

When should I contact a lawyer about a potential group claim?

You should contact a lawyer specializing in employment class actions as soon as you suspect a systemic issue is affecting you and your colleagues. These cases are procedurally complex and require expert legal analysis to determine if a class action is a viable path.

Common Scenarios

  • A delivery company classifies all its drivers as 'independent contractors' to avoid paying minimum wage and vacation pay, even though it controls their routes, hours, and work methods.
  • A large financial institution has a company-wide policy of not paying overtime to hundreds of analysts, claiming they are exempt from the Employment Standards Act when they are not.
  • A manufacturing plant systematically rounds down employee hours on their timecards, resulting in thousands of employees being underpaid for 10-15 minutes of work each day.
  • A national retailer fails to pay statutory holiday pay correctly to its entire part-time workforce for several years due to a payroll system error.
  • A tech firm lays off a large group of employees but miscalculates their termination and severance pay based on an incorrect interpretation of the ESA.

What You Should Know

  • If you suspect a widespread issue, talk to your coworkers to see if they are experiencing the same problem. The strength of a potential class action lies in the number of people affected.
  • Keep any documents that demonstrate the company-wide policy, such as memos, employee handbooks, pay stubs, and emails related to the issue.
  • Do not delay. Ontario's laws impose strict time limits for filing legal claims, so it is important to seek legal information promptly.
  • Consult with a law firm that has specific experience litigating employment class actions, as they have unique procedural rules and strategies.
  • Avoid signing any document from your employer that asks you to waive your rights concerning the issue until you have had it reviewed by a lawyer.

Featured Cases

Ngan v. The Bank of Nova Scotia

2025 ONSC 2354 (CanLII) · 2025-04-16

Class Action Employment Case: Bank of Nova Scotia - Certification and Vacations

A class action case involving the Bank of Nova Scotia where the court certified a class of employees who received incentive awards or RSUs, addressing whether these constitute 'wages' under the Canada Labour Code. The court also granted partial discontinuance of claims related to unused and expired vacation days and approved amendments to the claim to reflect individualized issues.

breach of contract class action employment contract vacation and holiday pay

Morris v. Solar Brokers Canada Corp.

2024 ONSC 3727 (CanLII) · 2024-06-28

Class Action Employment Case: Settlement and Fees Approved

A class action case involving the misclassification of workers as independent contractors instead of employees, leading to claims for unpaid wages, overtime, vacation pay, and other benefits under the Employment Standards Act. The court approved the settlement agreement, notice plan, and distribution plan, and also approved the fees requested by the class counsel.

class action contingency fees employment standards settlement approval

Davidson v. T.E.S. Contract Services Inc.

2024 ONSC 1044 (CanLII) · 2024-02-20

Class Action: Employment Standards and Independent Contractor Classification

A class action certification motion regarding the classification of workers as employees under the Employment Standards Act, focusing on the relevance of the defendant's temporary help agency licence application. The court ordered production of relevant portions of the application, subject to redactions, to inform the certification process.

class action employment standards independent contractor temporary help agency licence

Wasylyk v. Lyft

2024 ONSC 664 (CanLII) · 2024-01-30

Lyft Class Action: Arbitration Agreements and Employment Standards

A class action case involving Lyft drivers who alleged they were employees under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court granted a stay of the class action in favour of arbitration, upheld the enforceability of arbitration provisions, and found the arbitration agreement lawful under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. Summary judgment was not granted due to the need for individual assessments.

arbitration class action employee misclassification employment standards summary judgment

Davis v. Amazon Canada Fulfillment Services, ULC

2023 ONSC 3665 (CanLII) · 2023-06-19

Class Action Employment Case: Arbitration Agreements and Misclassification

A class action case involving Delivery Partners (DPs) and Driver Associates (DAs) against Amazon Canada Fulfillment Services, ULC. The court enforced arbitration agreements for DAs, denied certification for DAs and DPs due to failure in meeting class action criteria, and ruled on the common employer status and misclassification of employees under employment law.

arbitration agreement breach of contract class action common employer employee misclassification

Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.

2023 ONSC 1942 (CanLII) · 2023-03-27

Uber Class Action: Employment Relationship and Arbitration Clause

A class action case where plaintiffs alleged they were employees of Uber and sought to challenge the enforceability of the Class Action Waiver and Arbitration Clause in Uber’s Service Agreements. The court determined whether the relationship between the parties is governed by employment law and whether the claims were statute-barred under the two-year limitation period.

arbitration clauses class action employment relationship employment standards

Cunningham v. RBC Dominion Securities

2022 ONSC 5862 (CanLII) · 2022-12-29

Class Action Employment Standards: RBC Dominion Securities Breach

A class action lawsuit was certified under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, addressing systemic non-compliance with employment standards legislation for vacation and public holiday pay among commissioned employees. The court granted certification as the requirements under s. 5(1) were satisfied, and the representative plaintiff was deemed suitable.

class action commissioned employees employment standards legislation vacation and public holiday pay

Le Feuvre v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Canada Company

2022 ONSC 4136 (CanLII) · 2022-07-15

Class Action Employment Case: Misclassification of Branch Managers as Overtime-Exempt

A class action case regarding the misclassification of branch managers as overtime-exempt employees, challenging the commonality of issues and the methodology for assessing damages. The court denied certification due to lack of commonality and rejected the proposed methodologies for damages assessment.

certification class action employment misclassification overtime

Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.

2022 ONSC 1996 (CanLII) · 2022-03-31

Uber Class Action: Employment Misclassification and Certification Order

A class action case regarding employment misclassification and breaches of employment contracts against Uber Technologies Inc. The court addressed disputes over the Certification Order's phrasing and costs of the motion.

certification order class action costs employee misclassification

Bourque v. Cineflix

2021 ONSC 8464 (CanLII) · 2021-12-23

Class Action Employment Case: Settlement and Fees Approval

A class action case involving the misclassification of workers and alleged failure to pay overtime, holiday, and vacation pay under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court is considering the approval of a settlement and the fees for class counsel, as well as an honorarium for a representative plaintiff.

class action contingency fees employment standards settlement approval

Baroch v. Canada Cartage

2021 ONSC 7376 (CanLII) · 2021-11-10

Class Action Employment: Overtime and Misclassification Settlement

A class action lawsuit alleging systemic failure to pay overtime and misclassification of employees under the Canada Labour Code was settled for $22.25 million after eight years of litigation. The court must assess the fairness of the settlement, honorarium for the representative plaintiff, and legal fees for class counsel.

class action overtime thresholds settlement approval unpaid overtime

Navartnarajah v. FSB Group Ltd.

2021 ONSC 5418 (CanLII) · 2021-08-11

Class Action Employment Case: Misclassification of Independent Contractors

A class action was certified for workers misclassified as independent contractors, seeking statutory entitlements under the Employment Standards Act. The court found the claims met the criteria for certification, including common issues and a preferable procedure.

class action common issues employment standards misclassification

Brown v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd.

2021 ONSC 4185 (CanLII) · 2021-06-09

Employee Misclassification Class Action: Substitution of Representative Plaintiff

A class action case regarding employee misclassification where the court must decide whether to substitute a representative plaintiff and whether her claim is tenable despite the limitations defence and her job-seeking activities.

class action employee misclassification employment standards act substitution of representative plaintiff

Aps v. Flight Centre Travel Group

2020 ONSC 6779 (CanLII) · 2020-11-12

Class Action Settlement for Unpaid Overtime: $7 Million Approved

A class action case regarding unpaid overtime claims for employees of Flight Centre Travel Group. The court certified the settlement for $7 million and approved a distribution protocol based on employment duration, as well as an honorarium for the representative plaintiff and legal fees for class counsel.

class action honorarium approval settlement agreements unpaid overtime

Montaque v. Handa Travel Student Trip Ltd.

2020 ONSC 6459 (CanLII) · 2020-10-23

Class Action Employment Misclassification: Trip Leaders Entitled to Wages and Benefits

A class action case where Trip Leaders, previously classified as volunteers, were granted certification to pursue claims for wages and benefits under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The court also addressed the breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims related to the misclassification.

breach of contract class action employee misclassification wages and benefits

Fresco v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

2020 ONSC 4288 (CanLII) · 2020-08-10

Class Action Employment Case: Unpaid Overtime and Contract Breaches

A class action lawsuit against the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce regarding unpaid overtime, breach of employment contracts, and unjust enrichment. The court certified a common issue for aggregate damages and found no punitive damages due to the defendant's conduct.

breach of employment contract class action unjust enrichment unpaid overtime

Walmsley v. 2016169 Ontario Inc.

2020 ONSC 1416 (CanLII) · 2020-03-04

Class Action Settlement for Misclassified Teachers: ESA Benefits and Claims Discontinuance

A class action settlement was approved for teachers misclassified as independent contractors, addressing ESA benefits and legal fees. The court also approved the discontinuance of claims for online-only teachers.

certification of class action class action settlement employee misclassification esa benefits

Singh v. RBC Insurance Agency Ltd.

2020 ONSC 182 (CanLII) · 2020-01-20

Class Action Employment Standards: Common Employer Doctrine and Costs

A class action case involving RBC Insurance Agency Ltd. regarding employment standards violations and common employer status. The court considered whether a summary judgment motion should be scheduled before a certification motion and applied principles from various legal cases. The case also involved statutory interpretation of the Employment Standards Act, 2000, and workplace health and safety costs.

class action common employer costs employment standards act summary judgment

Bozsik v. Livingston

2019 ONSC 5340 (CanLII) · 2019-09-16

Class Action Employment: Unpaid Overtime Settlement Approved

A class action for unpaid overtime claims was certified and settled for $19 million. The court approved the settlement and distribution protocol, as well as the contingency fees for class counsel and the fees of the amicus curiae.

amicus curiae class action contingency fees settlement unpaid overtime

Azar v. Strada Crush Limited

2018 ONSC 4763 (CanLII) · 2018-08-17

Class Action Certification for Employment Standards Act Claims

A class action certification motion was granted for claims under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, regarding overtime and holiday pay exemptions for yard employees. The court also certified the class action as the preferable procedure for addressing systemic employment issues.

certification class action employment standards act overtime and holiday pay preferable procedure