Conflict of Interest — Ontario Employment Law

7 casesDecisions from 1963–2017

About Conflict of Interest

In Ontario employment law, a conflict of interest arises when an employee's personal, financial, or outside professional interests interfere—or appear to interfere—with their obligations to their employer. While senior executives might owe strict 'fiduciary duties' (which limit their actions even more strictly), all employees in Ontario owe their employer a basic common law duty of fidelity and good faith. This means you are generally expected not to act in ways that actively harm your employer's business or directly compete against them while employed.

Workplace conflicts of interest frequently involve scenarios like moonlighting for a direct competitor, awarding company contracts to family members without disclosure, or taking advantage of a corporate opportunity for personal gain. A notable issue in Ontario case law occurs when employees use company resources, time, or subordinate staff to develop their own side businesses or products. Employers often maintain specific, written conflict of interest policies detailing what must be disclosed and which outside activities are strictly prohibited.

When a conflict is discovered, employers may attempt to terminate the employee for 'just cause,' arguing the conflict destroyed the necessary trust in the employment relationship. However, Ontario courts apply a contextual approach (often referring to the principles established in cases like McKinley and Dowling) to determine if termination without severance is a proportional response. A minor, harmless, or perceived conflict does not automatically give an employer the right to fire someone without notice. The court will look at the employee's seniority, the nature of the business, whether deception was involved, and if the employer had a clear policy in place.

Interestingly, 'conflict of interest' also frequently arises in the procedural side of employment law, particularly concerning legal representation. For instance, disputes occasionally occur when a union's retained lawyer faces a conflict between the interests of the broader union and an individual member's specific grievance.

Because distinguishing between a harmless side-project and a legal breach of loyalty is heavily dependent on specific workplace dynamics, workers should review their situations carefully. It is highly recommended that you consult a qualified Ontario employment professional to analyze the distinct facts of your scenario before assuming you are at fault or forfeiting your right to a severance package.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I be fired in Ontario for having a side business or moonlighting?

Yes, but whether it constitutes 'just cause' (firing without severance) depends on if the side business directly competes with your employer, drains your energy during regular hours, or violates a clear workplace policy. Harmless side operations in unrelated industries generally do not justify a termination for cause.

Does a workplace conflict of interest automatically prove just cause for termination?

No. Ontario courts use a principle of proportionality. Even if a conflict exists, the employer must prove that the misconduct was serious enough to irreparably destroy the employment relationship. If the employer fails to prove this, you are still entitled to comprehensive severance pay.

What is the best thing to do if I suspect I have a conflict of interest at work?

Transparency is your strongest protection. You should disclose the potential conflict in writing to your manager or human resources department as soon as possible, allowing the company to review it and grant written permission if they deem it acceptable.

Can my employer control my behavior outside of normal working hours?

Employers generally do not control your off-duty time; however, if your specific after-hours activities create a tangible conflict of interest—such as actively poaching your employer's clients or publicly undermining their business—you can still be disciplined.

How long do I have to file a claim if I was wrongfully fired over a false conflict of interest accusation?

Under the Limitations Act, 2002, you generally have two years from the date of your termination to file a civil claim for wrongful dismissal in Ontario. Missing this deadline typically means you lose the right to sue.

Can my union's lawyer represent me if our interests seem to clash?

Legal conflicts of interest can arise if a union-retained lawyer's duty to the union conflicts with your individual grievance needs. If there is a legitimate clash of interests, legal rules of professional conduct may require you to have separate counsel to ensure your specific rights are fairly represented.

At what point should I talk to an employment lawyer about a conflict of interest accusation?

If you are summoned to an investigative meeting about a potential conflict, or if you have just been terminated for cause under these allegations, you should secure independent legal counsel immediately to protect your reputation and financial entitlements.

Common Scenarios

  • An IT professional uses their employer's proprietary software licenses and equipment after hours to secretly code a competing app, instructing a junior colleague to assist them in the venture.
  • A procurement manager awards a lucrative supply contract to a vendor without disclosing to the employer that the vendor company is owned by the manager's sibling.
  • An employee is fired 'for cause' after taking a weekend job in retail, even though their primary weekday employer is in the manufacturing sector and there is no overlap in business interests.
  • A unionized employee discovers that the lawyer handling their workplace grievance is simultaneously defending the union against a separate complaint they filed, creating a legal representation conflict.

What You Should Know

  • Always read your employment contract and employee handbook thoroughly; many organizations have specific clauses outlining exactly how and when to report outside business activities.
  • Document any disclosures you make to management regarding potential conflicts, ensuring you receive their acknowledgment or approval in writing rather than relying on a verbal agreement.
  • Never use company-issued laptops, phones, unreleased data, or paid company time to develop a personal business venture, as this strongly supports an employer's case for termination.
  • If your employer accuses you of a conflict and demands you sign an agreement or a 'for cause' termination letter, refrain from signing anything until you have a legal practitioner evaluate the merits of their claim.

Featured Cases

Teixeira v. Hamburg Olson LPC

2017 ONSC 7532 (CanLII) · 2017-12-18

Wrongful Dismissal: Conflict of Interest and Settlement Privilege

A wrongful dismissal case where the court ruled on motions to remove counsel, strike a motion record, and award costs. The case centered on a conflict of interest due to the lawyer's personal involvement, settlement privilege waiver, and the lawyer's representation of a corporation as a lay representative.

conflict of interest costs award settlement privilege wrongful dismissal

Johar v Best Buy Canada

2016 ONSC 5287 (CanLII) · 2016-08-31

Wrongful Dismissal: Employee Terminated for Conflict of Interest and Dishonesty

A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for alleged conflict of interest and dishonesty. The court found the employer failed to prove just cause and awarded 11 months' notice period and $55,796.29 in damages, considering the plaintiff's efforts to mitigate.

conflict of interest just cause mitigation of damages reasonable notice wrongful dismissal

Forsyth v Blue Rock Wealth Management Inc.

2015 ONSC 6666 (CanLII) · 2015-12-10

Civil Procedure: Removal of Counsel in Wrongful Dismissal and Discrimination Case

A civil procedure case involving the removal of counsel due to potential conflicts of interest in a wrongful dismissal and discrimination lawsuit. The court balanced the right to counsel of choice with the public perception of justice and removed the counsel due to her close connection to the case and contentious communications.

civil procedure conflict of interest removal of counsel wrongful dismissal

Corso v. Nebs Business Products Limited

2009 CanLII 11215 (ON SC) · 2009-03-17

Wrongful Dismissal: Employee Terminated for Developing Competing Product

A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for cause after allegedly breaching a conflict of interest policy by developing a competing product (eVault) using company resources and involving a subordinate. The court assessed whether the termination was justified and whether the employee was entitled to damages or notice, applying the McKinley v. BC Tel and Dowling v. Ontario (WSIB) frameworks. The employer also claimed copyright ownership of the eVault project under the Copyright Act.

conflict of interest copyright ownership fiduciary duties termination for cause wrongful dismissal

Henson v. Ontario Hydro Corp.

1995 CanLII 7291 (ON SC) · 1995-05-16

Union Representation and Confidentiality in Grievance Proceedings

A case addressing whether a union-retained lawyer owes a duty of confidentiality or loyalty to a union member during grievance proceedings, and whether a solicitor-client relationship exists between the lawyer and the member. The case also examines potential conflicts of interest when a union-retained law firm represents the union in litigation initiated by a former member.

conflict of interest duty of confidentiality grievance process labour relations union representation

Re Canadian Shipbuilding & Engineering Ltd. and United Steelworkers of America

1973 CanLII 591 (ON SC) · 1973-05-15

Arbitration Impartiality: Employee Eligibility as Arbitrator in Labour Dispute

A labour and employment case addressing whether an employee of a party to a collective agreement can serve as an impartial arbitrator, given potential conflicts of interest and the duty of impartiality. The case examines statutory interpretation of the Labour Relations Act and the principles of arbitration.

arbitration collective agreements conflict of interest impartiality labour and employment

Regina v. Ontario Labour Relations Board; Ex parte Hall

1963 CanLII 189 (ON SC) · 1963-04-10

Labour Relations Board Bias Case: Dual Roles and Conflict of Interest

A merits decision addressing whether a member of the Ontario Labour Relations Board is disqualified for bias due to their dual role as a Board member and an executive officer of a labour organization. The case examines the test for reasonable likelihood of bias and whether statutory provisions override common law principles of impartiality in quasi-judicial decision-making.

bias conflict of interest labour and employment labour relations quasi-judicial tribunal