Labour Relations Act — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Labour Relations Act
In Ontario, the legal landscape for employees is divided into two distinct streams: one for non-unionized workplaces and another for unionized ones. The rulebook for the latter is the Ontario Labour Relations Act, 1995 (LRA). If you are a member of a union, this Act, along with your collective agreement, fundamentally shapes your rights and the processes for resolving workplace disputes. It governs how unions are formed, the rules of collective bargaining, the conduct of strikes and lockouts, and how conflicts are handled.
The most significant impact of the LRA for an individual worker is the principle of exclusive jurisdiction. As established in landmark cases like Weber v. Ontario Hydro, if the essential character of a dispute arises from the collective agreement, it must be resolved through the grievance and arbitration process defined in that agreement. This means a unionized employee generally cannot sue their employer in court for issues like wrongful dismissal, unjust discipline, or disputes over pay and hours. Instead, they must file a grievance with the support of their union, which may ultimately proceed to a binding hearing before a neutral arbitrator. The Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) is the specialized tribunal that administers the LRA, hearing disputes related to union certification, unfair labour practices by an employer, or complaints that a union has failed in its Duty of Fair Representation to a member. Understanding this framework is the first step for any unionized employee facing a problem at work, as the path to a remedy is entirely different from that of their non-union counterparts. The interaction between a collective agreement and other laws can be intricate, and getting guidance on your specific circumstances is often a wise decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue my employer for wrongful dismissal if I'm in a union in Ontario?
Generally, no. Under the Labour Relations Act, disputes concerning termination for unionized employees are handled through the grievance and arbitration process outlined in your collective agreement, not the civil courts. Your union would file a grievance on your behalf.
What is the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB)?
The OLRB is an independent, quasi-judicial tribunal that administers and interprets the Labour Relations Act. It handles matters like union certification applications, unfair labour practice complaints against employers or unions, and disputes during strikes or lockouts.
What can I do if my union won't help me with my problem at work?
The Labour Relations Act imposes a 'Duty of Fair Representation' on unions, meaning they must not act in a manner that is arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith when representing you. If you believe your union has failed in this duty, you can file a complaint against the union at the OLRB.
Are there time limits for filing grievances or complaints under the LRA?
Yes, and they are typically very strict. Collective agreements often specify a short window, sometimes only 5-10 days, to file a grievance after an incident. Similarly, complaints to the OLRB, such as for a breach of the Duty of Fair Representation, also have specific limitation periods.
What's the difference between the Labour Relations Act and the Employment Standards Act?
The LRA governs the relationship between unions and employers, including collective bargaining and dispute resolution. The Employment Standards Act (ESA) sets out minimum standards for most workplaces, unionized or not. While a collective agreement can provide greater rights than the ESA, it cannot provide less.
When should I consult a lawyer about a unionized workplace issue?
You should consider consulting a labour lawyer if you believe your union is not representing you fairly, if your case involves complex jurisdictional questions (e.g., human rights claims alongside contract issues), or if you need independent advice before filing a complaint against your union with the OLRB.
Common Scenarios
- A manufacturing plant worker, who is a union member, is fired for allegedly being late too often. Instead of suing, she contacts her union steward to file a grievance for unjust termination under the collective agreement.
- A nurse in a unionized hospital is denied a promotion she believes she was entitled to based on seniority. Her path to challenge the decision is through the grievance procedure, not a civil lawsuit.
- An employee feels their union hastily settled their discipline grievance for terms the employee did not agree to. The employee considers filing a Duty of Fair Representation complaint against the union at the OLRB.
- During collective bargaining, an employer directly communicates a new offer to employees instead of to the union bargaining committee, prompting the union to file an unfair labour practice complaint for bargaining in bad faith.
What You Should Know
- If you are in a union, your collective agreement is your most important workplace document. Read it to understand your rights regarding pay, discipline, and grievances.
- For any workplace issue, your first point of contact should be your union steward or representative. They are your designated advocate under the Labour Relations Act.
- Pay close attention to timelines. The window to file a grievance after a disciplinary meeting or termination is often extremely short, sometimes only a matter of days.
- Keep detailed, dated notes of all incidents and your communications with both management and your union representatives. This documentation is vital for any future grievance or complaint.
- If you are considering a complaint against your union to the OLRB, seeking advice from a lawyer specializing in labour law can help you understand the process and the strength of your case.
Featured Cases
SkipTheDishes Restaurant Services Inc. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers
2025 ONSC 1399 (CanLII) · 2025-03-18Judicial Review: Union Certification Voting Dispute
This is a judicial review concerning the certification of a union by the Canadian Union of Postal Workers against SkipTheDishes Restaurant Services Inc. The court reviewed the process under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, specifically addressing issues related to voting and certification.
Canadian Union of Skilled Workers v. Four Seasons Site Development Ltd.
2024 ONSC 6398 (CanLII) · 2024-11-27Judicial Review: Related Employer Declaration Dismissed
This is a judicial review of an Ontario Labour Relations Board decision regarding whether two entities should be declared a single employer under the Labour Relations Act. The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the Board's exercise of discretion and its reasons met the standard of reasonableness under Vavilov.
H. v Kerry’s Place Autism Services
2017 ONSC 3483 (CanLII) · 2017-06-08Wrongful Dismissal Jurisdiction: Weber Analysis Applied
This is an interlocutory proceeding regarding jurisdiction and a motion to amend pleadings in a wrongful dismissal case. The plaintiff, dismissed for cause during a statutory freeze period, sought to proceed in court rather than before the Ontario Labour Relations Board. The court applied the Weber analysis, determining that the essential character of the claim predated union certification and was unrelated to union activities, thus retaining jurisdiction. Leave to amend the Statement of Claim was granted to remove references to union organizing activities, and the defendant's motion to strike was dismissed with costs.
EllisDon Corp. v. International Union of Painters et al
2012 ONSC 5810 (CanLII) · 2012-10-15A judicial review application concerning labour relations issues, specifically the determination of successor employer status under the Labour Relations Act.
M. v. Manufacturers Life Assurance Co.
2005 CanLII 4580 (ON SC) · 2005-02-24Unionized Employee Disability Benefits: Arbitrability Under Collective Agreement
A merits decision involving a unionized employee seeking long-term disability benefits under a collective agreement. The court addressed whether the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of a labour arbitrator and whether claims of negligence, bad faith, and punitive damages require court adjudication or fall under arbitration. The plaintiff’s action was dismissed in favour of arbitration, with costs awarded to the defendants.
Ontario (Minister of Community & Social Services) v. Ontario Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board
1997 CanLII 16262 (ON SC) · 1997-03-14Wrongful Dismissal: Employee Dismissed for Sexual Assault and Evidentiary Ruling Challenged
A merits decision involving a wrongful dismissal case where an employee was dismissed for sexual assault, and the Ontario Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board refused to admit a certificate of conviction as prima facie evidence of assault. The court ruled that the Board's evidentiary decision was patently unreasonable and contrary to statutory duties under the Labour Relations Act.
K. v. Toronto Board of Education
1996 CanLII 8125 (ON SC) · 1996-08-26Wrongful Dismissal and Collective Agreement Jurisdiction in Employment Law
A merits decision involving a wrongful dismissal and constructive dismissal claim under a collective agreement, with questions about the jurisdiction of grievance-arbitration under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and whether claims of sexual harassment and discrimination can be pursued as independent torts in civil court.
United Steelworkers of America, Local 12998 v. Liquid Carbonic Inc.
1996 CanLII 11787 (ON SC) · 1996-06-12Labour Relations Act: Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement in Grievance Arbitration
A merits decision involving a grievance arbitration where an arbitrator awarded compensation in lieu of reinstatement after finding no just cause for dismissal. The case examines whether the Labour Relations Act permits such compensation as a lesser penalty and the applicable standard of review for judicial review of the arbitrator’s decision.
Sobeys Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers' International Union, Local 1000A
1993 CanLII 8631 (ON SC) · 1993-07-30Labour Relations Case: Sobeys Inc. and UFCW Local 1000A
A labour relations case involving Sobeys Inc. and United Food & Commercial Workers' International Union, Local 1000A, addressing issues under the Labour Relations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.2, s. 65.
Cambridge Towel Corp. v. A.C.T.W.U. (Div. Ct.)
1988 CanLII 4848 (ON SC) · 1988-12-08Termination Under Collective Agreement: Notice Requirements Deemed Procedural
A merits decision involving the termination of employment under a collective agreement, addressing whether failure to comply with notice requirements renders the termination null and void. The arbitration board held that non-compliance nullifies dismissal, but the court found this interpretation patently unreasonable as notice constitutes a procedural protection, not a substantive right.
Re Windsor Western Hospital Centre Inc. and M. et al.
1986 CanLII 2635 (ON SC) · 1986-08-05Labour Relations Act: OLRB Jurisdiction and Union Duty of Representation
A labour and employment case involving disputes over the Ontario Labour Relations Board's (OLRB) jurisdiction to order a recommencement of arbitration after a final and binding award, as well as allegations of union breach of duty of fair representation and employer interference with union rights.
Re Great Atlantic & Pacific Co. of Canada Ltd. and United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Locals 175 and 633 et al.
1984 CanLII 1983 (ON SC) · 1984-05-03Grievance Arbitration: Employee Discharged for Theft and Reinstatement Conditions
A grievance arbitration case involving an employee discharged for theft, where the arbitrator imposed conditions on reinstatement, including a permanent record of the incident and future penalties without grievance rights. The court upheld the permanent record condition but quashed the removal of future grievance rights, finding it contravened the Labour Relations Act and collective agreement.
B. v. Otis Elevator Co. Ltd.
1984 CanLII 5823 (ON SC) · 1984-03-07Wrongful Dismissal and Collective Agreements: Court Jurisdiction and Severance Pay
A wrongful dismissal case involving an employee covered by a collective agreement who brought a claim in court despite an arbitration clause. The case examines whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the claim under the Labour Relations Act and whether the employee can claim severance pay when the collective agreement does not explicitly address it.
Maritime Life Assurance Co. v. Chateau Gardens (Hanover) Inc. et al.
1983 CanLII 1979 (ON SC) · 1983-10-12Successor Employer Status of Court-Appointed Receiver-Manager in Labour Relations Act Case
A merits decision involving a court-appointed receiver-manager and its status as a successor employer under the Labour Relations Act. The case examines whether the receiver-manager is bound by a collective agreement and whether the court appointment constitutes a 'disposition' under the Labour Relations Act. Retroactive wages awarded to employees are also considered for priority payment over secured creditors.
Re Ontario Hydro and Ontario Hydro Employees' Union, Local 1000 et al.
1983 CanLII 1868 (ON CA) · 1983-04-19Ontario Hydro Arbitration: Probationary Employee Dismissals
This is a judicial review or appeal concerning the jurisdiction of a grievance arbitration board in a labour dispute. The central issue was whether section 37(1) of the Labour Relations Act, which mandates arbitration for disputes under a collective agreement, precluded parties from excluding probationary employee dismissals from arbitration. The court reviewed the arbitration board's jurisdiction and held that collective agreement provisions conflicting with the statute were rendered void.
Re City of Toronto and Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79
1981 CanLII 1660 (ON SC) · 1981-07-27Arbitration Dismissal Case: Admissibility of County Court Judge Report
A merits decision involving a dismissal without cause and the admissibility of a County Court Judge’s report as evidence in an arbitration proceeding. The arbitration board excluded the report, raising questions about its discretion under section 37(7)(c) of the Labour Relations Act and whether natural justice principles were violated.
Re Perth District Health Unit and Ontario Nurses' Association et al.
1979 CanLII 1779 (ON SC) · 1979-12-20Collective Agreement Bridging Clause and Arbitration Board Jurisdiction
A labour relations case involving the interpretation of a bridging clause in a collective agreement and the jurisdiction of an arbitration board to issue a new collective agreement post-expiry. The case also examines the authority of arbitration boards to include interest arbitration clauses in new agreements. The case later reached the Supreme Court of Canada (Ontario Nurses' Association v. Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit, [1983] 2 SCR 6). The Supreme Court ruled that the arbitration boards had jurisdiction to hear the interest arbitrations and were authorized to insert the interest arbitration clause into the new collective agreements. The Court of Appeal's order quashing the inclusion of this provision was set aside.
Re Hughes Boat Works Inc. and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural and Implement Workers of America (UAW) Local 1620 et al.
1979 CanLII 1853 (ON SC) · 1979-10-17Successor Employer: Collective Agreement Binding on Purchaser
A judicial review application concerning whether a purchaser of a business qualifies as a successor employer under section 55 of the Labour Relations Act, thereby becoming bound by the existing collective agreement. The court examined the definition of 'sale', the Ontario Labour Relations Board's interpretation, and whether the Board committed a jurisdictional error protected by privative clauses.
Re B. et al. and Wentworth Arms Hotel Ltd. et al.
1975 CanLII 392 (ON SC) · 1975-03-04This is a labour relations case concerning the validity of extension provisions in a collective agreement and the jurisdiction of arbitration boards to determine such validity. The court addressed whether provisions extending the agreement's operation until a new agreement is concluded constitute a valid exercise of powers under the Labour Relations Act, as well as the interpretation of no-strike clauses. The case later reached the Supreme Court of Canada (B. v. Wentworth Arms Hotel, [1979] 1 SCR 846). The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the arbitration award. The Court held that the collective agreement had terminated, meaning the union was free to strike and the strike was not unlawful under the agreement's terms or statutory provisions.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. H. et al.
1974 CanLII 532 (ON SC) · 1974-05-17Illegal Strike Injunction: Labour Relations Act Enforcement
A labour and employment case involving an illegal strike and the enforcement of an injunction to prohibit picketing. The court ruled that all picketing, including peaceful picketing, may be enjoined if it causes substantial or irreparable harm to the employer, under the Labour Relations Act.