Non-Solicitation — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Non-Solicitation
In Ontario employment law, non-solicitation refers to the obligation of a departing worker not to actively pursue, invite, or encourage their former employer's clients, customers, or employees to follow them to a new business. Unlike a non-competition restriction—which attempts to block someone from working in a specific industry or geographic area entirely—non-solicitation generally allows an individual to compete in the same market, provided they do not cannibalize their former employer's established relationships.
A central issue in non-solicitation cases is the distinction between 'soliciting' and 'accepting' business. Under Ontario common law, solicitation requires an active step or an 'ask.' If a former client discovers you have changed companies and independently decides to move their business to you without any prompting, this is typically viewed as accepting business rather than soliciting. However, the line between a simple professional social media update and a targeted marketing push can be remarkably thin, and courts scrutinize the nature of the communication carefully.
While many employees are only bound by non-solicitation if they signed a specific written agreement (a restrictive covenant), special rules apply to 'fiduciary' employees. Senior executives, directors, or key managerial staff who possess critical influence over the company's relationships owe a common law fiduciary duty to their employer. In Ontario, courts have consistently ruled that fiduciaries are prohibited from soliciting their former employer's clients or staff for a reasonable period after resignation, even if they never signed a formal non-solicitation contract.
When employers suspect non-solicitation obligations have been breached, they often take swift legal action. They may seek an 'interlocutory injunction'—a temporary court order demanding the immediate halt of the solicitation until a full trial can happen. If a court determines that wrongful solicitation occurred, the departing employee (and potentially their new employer) can be forced to pay damages, which are frequently calculated based on the lost profits resulting from the poached clients or staff.
Because the boundaries of acceptable post-employment conduct depend heavily on your former role, the industry norms, and how courts interpret the specifics of your departure, it is always recommended to have an employment lawyer review your situation before you reach out to former business contacts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the exact difference between non-solicitation and non-competition?
Non-competition aims to prevent you from working in the same industry or geographic area as your former employer. Non-solicitation allows you to work for a competitor or start a competing business, but restricts you from actively targeting your former employer's existing clients, customers, or staff.
Can I work with a former client if they contact me first?
Generally, yes. If a client reaches out to you completely unprompted and you did not actively encourage them to leave your former employer, courts usually consider this 'accepting' business rather than 'soliciting'. However, different rules may apply if you owe fiduciary duties or if your contract includes a specific 'non-dealing' restriction.
Am I bound by non-solicitation if I never signed a contract?
Most standard employees are not bound unless they signed an agreement. However, if you were a senior executive, director, or key managerial employee, you likely owe 'fiduciary duties' under common law, which automatically prohibit you from soliciting former clients or staff for a reasonable period after you leave.
Is it considered solicitation to announce my new job on LinkedIn?
A general, public profile update or broad post announcing your new employment is usually acceptable and not viewed as direct solicitation. However, sending direct, personalized messages to former clients or colleagues via LinkedIn can cross the line into active solicitation.
Does non-solicitation apply to poaching my former coworkers?
Yes, many non-solicitation obligations include a ban on soliciting employees. This means you cannot actively recruit, offer jobs to, or encourage your former colleagues to resign and join your new venture.
How quickly can my former employer sue me if they think I'm poaching clients?
Employers can act immediately by applying for an interlocutory injunction to stop your activities pending a trial. If you receive a cease-and-desist letter or notice of an injunction, you should consult an Ontario employment lawyer without delay, as strict court deadlines will apply.
Common Scenarios
- A departing sales representative starts a new job and immediately emails their top 15 client accounts from their previous employer, offering them a 10% discount to switch vendors.
- A former IT director starts an independent consulting firm. Even though they had no written contract, a court rules they cannot pursue their former employer's key accounts because their senior role made them a fiduciary.
- A popular hairstylist leaves a salon and posts a public Facebook status announcing their new location. Several clients see the post and book appointments independently without the stylist asking them to switch.
- A senior manager resigns to start a competing agency and privately texts three of their former top-performing subordinates, promising them higher salaries if they leave and join the new company.
What You Should Know
- Do not take, email to yourself, or download any client lists, contact databases, or business cards when you resign, as this creates a strong legal presumption that you intend to solicit.
- If a former client initiates contact with you, maintain a clear paper trail (like an email) showing that they reached out entirely unprompted.
- Be highly cautious with digital networking platforms; stick to general broadcast announcements rather than individually messaging contacts you met through your former employer.
- Before launching a competing venture or hiring former colleagues, sit down with an Ontario employment lawyer to clarify whether your past seniority imposes unwritten fiduciary duties upon you.
Featured Cases
Camino Modular Systems Inc. v. Kranidis
2019 ONSC 7437 (CanLII) · 2019-12-16Restrictive Covenants: Enforceability and Injunctions in Employment Agreements
A court case examining the enforceability of restrictive covenants in an employment agreement. The court ruled that the non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality clauses were overly broad and unenforceable, and excluded an affidavit as prejudicial. The case also considered the test for interlocutory injunctions based on the misuse of confidential information.
Computer Enhancement v J.C. Options, et al
2016 ONSC 452 (CanLII) · 2016-01-22Fiduciary Duties and Breaches of Non-Competition Agreements in Employment Dispute
A case determining fiduciary duties and breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation agreements between key employees and their former employer. The court found fiduciary obligations for a two-week period post-resignation and determined breaches of duties, calculating damages based on profits from solicitation during the breach period.
Brown v. First Contact Software Consultants Incorporated
2009 CanLII 48504 (ON SC) · 2009-09-14Employment Contract Dispute: Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreements Unenforceable
An employment dispute involving former employees and contractors alleged to have breached non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements. The employer sought an interlocutory injunction to restrain competition and solicitation, but the court found the restrictive covenants unreasonable and unenforceable. The court also denied the employer's request to image hard drives due to insufficient evidence of wrongdoing.
Precision Fine Papers Inc. v. Durkin
2008 CanLII 6871 (ON SC) · 2008-02-26Non-Solicitation Breach: Former Employee Injunction Extended
An employment contract dispute involving a former president and key employee who solicited customers for a competitor, breaching a non-solicitation clause and fiduciary duties. The employer sought an interlocutory injunction to prevent further solicitation, and the court extended the injunction to August 31, 2008, based on a strong prima facie case of breach and the irreparable harm caused to the employer's business interests.
KJA Consultants Inc. v. Soberman
2002 CanLII 49613 (ON SC) · 2002-02-11Senior Employee Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Injunction Granted for 18 Months
A breach of fiduciary duty case involving a senior employee who solicited over 300 clients and used confidential information, leading to a dispute over whether such actions constituted unfair competition and breach of obligations. The court considered injunctive relief and the duration of the injunction based on equitable principles.
Computer Centre Personnel Ltd. v. Lagopoulos et al. and two other actions
1975 CanLII 677 (ON SC) · 1975-02-28Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants in Employment Contracts
A case involving the enforceability of restrictive covenants in employment contracts, including non-competition and non-solicitation clauses. The court examined whether the covenants were reasonable in scope and duration, and whether they protected legitimate interests such as client lists, goodwill, and training investments.
Jiffy Foods Ltd. v. Chomski
1973 CanLII 699 (ON SC) · 1973-06-26Enforceability of Non-Solicitation Clause in Employment Contract
A case involving the enforceability of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract, where the employee was prohibited from soliciting customers of the former employer for 12 months after termination. The court considered whether the covenant was reasonable in time and area, and whether it could be enforced by injunction.