Settlement Agreements — Ontario Employment Law

20 casesDecisions from 1987–2025

About Settlement Agreements

When an employment relationship ends in a dispute, a settlement agreement is often the final chapter. In Ontario, a settlement agreement is a legally binding contract between an employer and an employee designed to resolve a workplace issue, most commonly a wrongful dismissal claim. Instead of proceeding to court, the parties agree to a resolution. Typically, the employer provides a financial package or other considerations (like a positive reference letter), and in exchange, the employee signs a 'full and final release,' giving up their right to sue the employer for any past or present claims.

These agreements are not just for terminations. They can be used to resolve human rights complaints, harassment allegations, or disputes over unpaid wages or bonuses. The core purpose is to achieve finality and certainty for both sides, avoiding the cost, time, and stress of litigation. Key components of a typical settlement agreement include the amount and structure of the payment (e.g., lump sum vs. salary continuance), confidentiality clauses preventing either party from discussing the terms, and non-disparagement clauses that prohibit speaking negatively about one another.

While governed by general contract law principles, courts scrutinize settlement agreements in the employment context due to the inherent power imbalance between an employer and an individual employee. An agreement must be entered into voluntarily and with a clear understanding of the terms. Because signing permanently waives significant legal rights, it's essential to comprehend every clause's implications. The specific wording can have major financial and legal consequences, making a thorough review by a professional before signing an indispensable step for any worker presented with such a document.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between a severance offer and a settlement agreement in Ontario?

A severance offer is the employer's proposal for compensation upon termination. A settlement agreement is the formal, legally binding contract you sign to accept that offer, which almost always includes a 'release' clause where you give up your right to sue. The offer becomes the basis for the final agreement.

Can I change my mind after I've signed a settlement agreement?

Generally, no. Once signed, a settlement agreement is a binding contract and is very difficult to overturn in Ontario. Courts will enforce them unless there is evidence of extreme circumstances like duress (being forced to sign), unconscionability, or a fundamental misunderstanding of the terms.

My former employer is pressuring me to sign a settlement agreement immediately. What are my rights?

You are entitled to a reasonable amount of time to review any legal document, including a settlement agreement. High-pressure tactics are a major red flag. You have the right to take the document away and seek independent legal advice before signing anything.

Is the money I receive from a settlement agreement taxable?

It depends on what the payment is for. Payments for lost wages or a retiring allowance (severance) are typically taxable income. However, portions designated as general damages for human rights violations or personal injury may be non-taxable. This is a complex area, and consulting with an employment lawyer or tax professional is highly recommended.

What happens if my employer doesn't pay me what the settlement agreement promised?

If an employer breaches a settlement agreement by failing to pay, you can take legal action to enforce the contract. This would typically involve suing them for the amount owed under the agreement, not for the original wrongful dismissal claim.

How long do I have to decide on a settlement offer?

The offer itself will usually state a deadline. If it doesn't, you have a 'reasonable' period. Remember that the underlying legal claim has its own deadline, typically two years from the date of the incident (like termination) under Ontario's Limitations Act, 2002, so you can't wait indefinitely.

When is it worth getting a lawyer to review a settlement agreement?

It is always worthwhile. A lawyer can determine if the compensation is fair compared to your entitlements under common law, identify problematic clauses like an overly broad release or confidentiality term, and negotiate for better terms on your behalf before you sign away your rights.

Common Scenarios

  • After being terminated without cause, an IT project manager is offered a severance package conditional on signing a multi-page settlement agreement and release.
  • An employee who experienced workplace harassment agrees to resign in exchange for a financial payment, a positive reference, and a settlement agreement containing a strict confidentiality clause.
  • Following a mediation for a wrongful dismissal claim, the parties reach a resolution that is written down into a binding settlement agreement which the court later enforces.
  • A company is sold, and a long-service employee is terminated. The settlement agreement they are offered includes language releasing both the old and new owners from any liability.

What You Should Know

  • Never sign a settlement agreement in the termination meeting. Always ask to take it with you to review it without pressure.
  • Read the 'Full and Final Release' clause very carefully. This is the core of the agreement where you give up your legal rights, and you must understand its scope.
  • If you receive a settlement payment, confirm in writing how it will be characterized for tax purposes (e.g., retiring allowance, damages) before the funds are issued.
  • Before accepting an offer, ensure it accounts for all your entitlements, including severance pay, vacation pay, benefits continuation, and potential human rights damages.
  • Consulting with an employment lawyer is a critical step to ensure the settlement is fair and the terms are clear before you sign what is almost always a final and binding document.

Featured Cases

Cross v. Cooling Tower Maintenance Inc.

2025 ONSC 7203 (CanLII) · 2025-12-23

Employment Contract Dispute: Summary Judgment and Lump Sum Payment

A case involving the interpretation and enforcement of a settlement agreement in an employment context. The court granted summary judgment, finding that the failure to disclose re-employment did not constitute repudiation, and ordered the payment of a lump sum. The court also dismissed a counterclaim for punitive damages.

contracts post-termination duties repudiation settlement agreements

Johnstone v. Loblaw

2025 ONSC 4755 (CanLII) · 2025-08-18

Employment Dispute: Settlement Agreement and Summary Judgment

A civil procedure case involving the interpretation of a settlement agreement and the admissibility of an affidavit in an employment dispute. The court determined whether the agreement was binding and whether a release clause barred claims related to a failed house purchase. Summary judgment was deemed appropriate to resolve the dispute.

contracts settlement agreements summary judgment termination of employment

Aps v. Flight Centre Travel Group

2020 ONSC 6779 (CanLII) · 2020-11-12

Class Action Settlement for Unpaid Overtime: $7 Million Approved

A class action case regarding unpaid overtime claims for employees of Flight Centre Travel Group. The court certified the settlement for $7 million and approved a distribution protocol based on employment duration, as well as an honorarium for the representative plaintiff and legal fees for class counsel.

class action honorarium approval settlement agreements unpaid overtime

Kearns v. Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited

2019 ONSC 4946 (CanLII) · 2019-08-22

Wrongful Dismissal: Settlement Agreement Enforced Despite Unilateral Mistake

A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff was terminated without cause and a settlement agreement was reached during mediation. The defendant sought to rescind the agreement due to a unilateral mistake, but the court enforced the settlement as valid and binding. The court also awarded partial costs to the plaintiff.

contracts enforcement minutes of settlement settlement agreements wrongful dismissal

Smith v Coca-Cola Bottling Company

2017 ONSC 396 (CanLII) · 2017-01-17

Settlement Agreement Dispute: Employee vs. Coca-Cola Bottling Company

A case involving a settlement agreement between an employee and Coca-Cola Bottling Company regarding short-term disability benefits. The dispute centered on whether the release extended to other benefits, with the court ruling in favor of the plaintiff and awarding costs.

contracts costs employee benefits settlement agreements

Ball v 189557 Ont. Inc.

2016 ONSC 3224 (CanLII) · 2016-05-16

Breach of Settlement Agreement: Damages Awarded for Unpaid Salary Installments

A case involving the termination of employment through a settlement agreement where the defendant failed to make six salary installments, leading to a breach of contract claim. The court found no fundamental breach but awarded damages for the unpaid balance of $25,000 USD and pre- and post-judgment interest, along with costs.

breach of contract contracts damages repudiation settlement agreements

RJM56 Investments Inc. v Kurnik

2015 ONSC 6893 (CanLII) · 2015-11-10

Employment Contract Dispute: Settlement Agreement and Statutory Contributions

A case involving the interpretation of a settlement agreement between RJM56 Investments Inc. and Kurnik. The court examined whether the employer's deductions from settlement payments violated the agreement and whether the employer's actions constituted a 'default' under the default clause. The court applied principles of contractual interpretation and statutory interpretation.

contracts employer obligations interpretation of terms settlement agreements

Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation

2014 ONSC 3882 (CanLII) · 2014-07-15

Employment Case: Termination Without Cause and Settlement Agreement Enforcement

A case involving the termination of an employee without cause where the employer rescinded a settlement agreement after an internal investigation into allegations of theft and nondisclosure. The court assessed whether the employer had just cause to rescind the agreement and whether the internal investigation met the required standard.

employer obligations internal investigation just cause for dismissal settlement agreements termination without cause

McGee-Maguire v. Dr. Christopher Tsang Dentistry Professional Corp. et al.

2013 ONSC 7688 (CanLII) · 2013-12-13

Wrongful Dismissal: Settlement Agreement Breach and Enforcement

A registered dental therapist brought a wrongful dismissal claim against their former employer. The case involved a settlement agreement that the employer breached, failing to pay the agreed amounts. The court enforced the settlement agreement but declined to award punitive damages for the breach.

breach of obligations enforcement punitive damages settlement agreements wrongful dismissal

Bland v. Canadian Farm Insurance

2012 ONSC 3021 (CanLII) · 2012-06-18

Wrongful Dismissal: Settlement Agreement and Reasonable Notice

A wrongful dismissal case where an employee terminated without cause after 15 months of service disputed the existence of a settlement agreement. The court applied the objective observer test and principles of contract formation to determine if a settlement agreement was reached. The case also addressed the appropriate period of pay in lieu of reasonable notice and the mitigation of damages.

reasonable notice settlement agreements termination package wrongful dismissal

Desgrosseillers v. North Bay General Hospital

2010 ONSC 142 (CanLII) · 2010-01-05

Employment Contract Dispute: Breach of Settlement Agreement Under Collective Agreement

A merits decision involving a dispute over the breach of a settlement agreement governed by a collective agreement. The plaintiff alleged a breach following termination of employment, and the court considered whether it had jurisdiction or if the matter fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of a labour arbitrator. The case also addressed whether the plaintiff's claim constituted an abuse of process and whether a default judgment should be set aside.

abuse of process collective agreements employment contract jurisdiction settlement agreements

Chater v. York Central Hospital

2009 CanLII 33022 (ON SC) · 2009-06-25

Settlement Agreement Enforcement: Employment Dispute Over $60,000 Offer

A merits decision involving the enforcement of a settlement agreement in an employment-related dispute. The plaintiff argued that the defendants' response to a $60,000 settlement offer did not constitute valid acceptance, but the court enforced the agreement under Rule 49.09, finding that essential terms were agreed upon despite disagreements on non-essential terms.

employment dispute enforcement of settlement agreements essential terms settlement agreements valid acceptance

Bjelakovic v. Accenture Global Services GmbH

2008 CanLII 32802 (ON SC) · 2008-07-04

Wrongful Dismissal: Settlement Agreement Enforceability Upheld

A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff signed a settlement agreement after termination but later claimed it was void due to duress, lack of capacity, and unconscionability. The court upheld the release as enforceable, finding insufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's allegations and granting summary judgment to the defendant.

employment disputes enforceability of releases settlement agreements summary judgment wrongful dismissal

Donaghy v. Scotia Capital Inc.

2008 CanLII 16190 (ON SC) · 2008-04-09

Wrongful Dismissal: Settlement Agreement Validity Under Rule 49.09

A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff challenged the validity of a pre-litigation settlement agreement, arguing it was void due to non-compliance with labour legislation and bad faith. The court upheld the settlement, finding no evidence of fraud, bad faith, or statutory non-compliance affecting its validity.

enforceability labour legislation rule 49.09 settlement agreements wrongful dismissal

Donaghy v. Scotia Capital Inc.

2004 CanLII 7702 (ON SC) · 2004-05-19

Settlement Agreement Dispute: Employee Challenges Overtime and Bonus Claims

A merits decision involving a plaintiff seeking to reopen a motion for judgment based on a settlement agreement, arguing that the agreement did not cover overtime and bonus claims under the Canada Labour Code and Ontario Employment Standards Act. The court ruled that the settlement agreement was binding and that the new evidence submitted was insufficient to justify reopening the motion.

binding nature employment contract fresh evidence settlement agreements statutory compliance

Kift v. Canada (Attorney General of)

2003 CanLII 11719 (ON SC) · 2003-02-06

RCMP Officer's Tort Claim After Employment Settlement

A merits decision involving an RCMP officer who commenced a tort action for damages after settling his employment under the Crown Liability Act and receiving a pension from the Consolidated Revenue Fund. The court examined whether the plaintiff was statute-barred from bringing a tort action due to the settlement agreement and the statutory framework.

costs crown liability act settlement agreements statutory bar termination of employment

Duncan v. Cadillac Fairview Corp.

1999 CanLII 15032 (ON SC) · 1999-08-06

Union Settlements and Employee Rights: Binding Authority Under Labour Relations Act

A case addressing whether union certification authorizes a union to bind individual employees to settlements without their consent, and whether a plaintiff can bring tort claims against an employer after a union settlement. The court ruled that certification alone does not bind employees to settlements without their consent and that tort claims predating a collective agreement are not subject to its arbitration procedures.

employee rights labour relations act settlement agreements tort claims union settlements

Bruce v. DPCE Computer Services Inc.

1992 CanLII 7736 (ON SC) · 1992-07-09

Wrongful Dismissal Settlement: Verbal Acceptance of $60,000 Offer Binding Under Rule 49

A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff verbally accepted a settlement offer of $60,000 from the defendant. The defendant argued that no settlement was reached due to the lack of written acceptance, raising the question of whether verbal acceptance satisfies Rule 49 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The court ruled that verbal acceptance of a formal offer to settle constitutes a binding agreement under Rule 49.

employment law rule 49 settlement agreements verbal acceptance wrongful dismissal

Re Consumers' Distributing Co. Ltd. and Ontario Human Rights Commission et al.

1987 CanLII 4055 (ON SC) · 1987-02-09

Human Rights Commission Settlement Review: Procedural Fairness and Discretion

A human rights case involving a settlement agreement where the Ontario Human Rights Commission was judicially reviewed for its decision not to ratify the agreement. The case examines whether the Commission breached procedural fairness by meeting with intervenors without the employer's presence and whether it properly exercised its discretion under section 28 of the Human Rights Code.

human rights code human rights employment judicial review procedural fairness settlement agreements