Masse et al. v. Dietrich
Tort Damages: Deducting Employer-Funded Disability Benefits
Summary
This appeal addresses whether a defendant in a tort action is entitled to deduct disability benefits received by the plaintiff from damages for lost wages. The benefits were provided under a plan fully funded by the employer pursuant to a collective agreement. The court held that the defendant could not deduct these benefits as they constituted part of the plaintiff's wages.
Outcome
Defendant not entitled to deduct disability benefits from damages for lost wages
Key Factors
- disability benefits
- deduction of damages
- employer-funded plan
- collective agreement
- tort damages
Related Cases
Bourque/Chima v. Public Service Alliance Of Canada et al
2026 ONSC 4761 (CanLII) · 2026-08-17This is an interlocutory proceeding addressing subject matter jurisdiction in a labour relations dispute. The court dismissed the action, finding that the Labour Board has exclusive jurisdiction over the union's internal disciplinary process and allegations of procedural unfairness under the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act.
Remcan Projects LP v. Wallace
2026 ONSC 3571 (CanLII) · 2026-06-17Labour Relations: Exclusive Jurisdiction & Stay of Action
This is a procedural ruling on a motion to stay a civil action and strike pleadings in a dispute concerning union organizing and certification. The court determined that the essential character of the dispute fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ontario Labour Relations Board under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, applying the Weber two-part test. Consequently, the civil action was stayed to avoid duplication and inconsistent findings, and specific tort claims were struck as non-justiciable certification harms.
Formenton v. Newport Sports Management Inc. et al.
2026 ONSC 1373 (CanLII) · 2026-03-06Arbitration Award Set Aside: Labour Relations & Fairness
This is a procedural ruling on an application to set aside an arbitration award in a closed shop labour relations context. The court addressed issues of arbitrator jurisdiction, the validity of a six-month contractual limitation period, and procedural fairness regarding the arbitrator's consideration of NHLPA information.
Titan Tool & Die Limited v. Unifor and its Local 195, et al
2025 ONSC 5580 (CanLII) · 2025-10-01Labour Dispute: Injunction Against Picketing
This is an interlocutory proceeding concerning a labour dispute where the employer sought to vary an existing injunction to restrain picketing at additional locations. The court addressed the admissibility of hearsay evidence in support of the injunction motion and balanced the union's constitutional freedom of expression against the employer's property rights.
Labourers’ International Union of North America, Loc 183 v Vox Construction Inc.
2025 ONSC 5531 (CanLII) · 2025-10-01Union Contempt Motion: 21-Day Incarceration for Non-Compliance
This is a procedural ruling on a motion for contempt of court brought by a union against an employer and its officer for failing to comply with a court order converting an arbitrator's award for unpaid wages and benefits. The court found the employer in civil contempt for intentional disobedience and ordered 21 days of incarceration to compel compliance, while also awarding substantial indemnity costs to the union.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.