Bad Faith — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Bad Faith
In Ontario employment law, the concept of 'bad faith' refers to an employer's breach of its duty to act honestly and fairly in its dealings with an employee. While employers have the right to manage their business and make decisions like terminating employment, they cannot exercise these rights in a manner that is dishonest, misleading, or unduly insensitive. This principle, solidified by the Supreme Court of Canada, means there is an underlying obligation of good faith performance in every employment contract.
Bad faith is not simply poor management or having an unpleasant boss. It involves a higher level of misconduct. Examples include an employer being untruthful about the reason for a termination, fabricating performance issues to justify a dismissal, conducting a biased or sham workplace investigation, or using the threat of termination to intimidate an employee into accepting a lesser role. The duty of good faith applies throughout the entire employment relationship—from hiring and performance management to the manner of dismissal. While it is most commonly argued in the context of termination (a topic covered in more detail on our 'bad faith dismissal' page), an employer's bad faith conduct during the course of employment can also give rise to legal claims.
Under the common law, if an employer is found to have acted in bad faith, a court can award additional damages beyond standard termination pay. These are often called 'moral' or 'aggravated' damages, intended to compensate the employee for the mental distress, humiliation, or harm to their reputation caused by the employer's blameworthy conduct. This is separate from damages for wrongful dismissal, which compensate for the failure to provide adequate notice. Because determining whether an employer's actions meet the legal standard for bad faith is so dependent on the specific details of the situation, understanding your rights and the evidence required is a critical first step.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the legal definition of 'bad faith' in Ontario employment?
In Ontario, 'bad faith' refers to a breach of the duty of honest and fair dealing in an employment contract. It involves conduct that is dishonest, misleading, malicious, or unduly insensitive, particularly when an employer is exercising its contractual powers, such as discipline or termination.
Is having a difficult or incompetent manager considered bad faith?
Not necessarily. Poor management, personality conflicts, or incompetence are generally not enough to meet the legal test for bad faith. Bad faith requires a more serious element of dishonesty, untruthfulness, or malicious intent in the employer's conduct.
What kind of damages can I claim if my employer acted in bad faith?
If you can prove bad faith, you may be entitled to moral or aggravated damages. These are awarded to compensate for the mental distress and harm caused by the employer's conduct, and are separate from any pay in lieu of notice you might receive for wrongful dismissal.
Can my employer act in bad faith even if I haven't been fired?
Yes. The duty of good faith applies throughout the employment relationship. Examples include being deliberately misled about a promotion, being subjected to a sham investigation, or being harassed in an attempt to force you to quit (which could be a constructive dismissal).
How do I prove that my employer's actions were in bad faith?
Proving bad faith requires evidence that shows the employer was dishonest, misleading, or unduly insensitive. This can include emails containing false statements, witness testimony, or documents that reveal a fabricated reason for discipline or termination.
Is there a deadline for making a bad faith claim in Ontario?
Yes, in most cases, you have two years from the date you discovered (or ought to have discovered) the bad faith conduct to file a civil lawsuit, as per Ontario's 'Limitations Act, 2002'. It's crucial to act promptly to protect your rights.
When should I consult an employment lawyer about potential bad faith?
You should consider consulting a lawyer if you believe your employer has been untruthful, has targeted you unfairly, or has acted in a cruel or exceptionally insensitive manner, especially during a vulnerable time like a performance review, investigation, or termination.
Common Scenarios
- An employer, wanting to avoid paying a large severance package, creates a false record of poor performance for a long-service employee to justify a 'for cause' termination.
- A manager lies to an employee, assuring them their job is secure after a merger, which convinces the employee to decline another job offer, only to be terminated weeks later.
- During a harassment complaint investigation, the employer only interviews witnesses friendly to the alleged harasser and dismisses the complaining employee's evidence without proper consideration.
- An employee on approved medical leave is told their position is being eliminated, but the company immediately posts a job opening for the exact same role under a slightly different title.
- An employer terminates an employee and then makes false and damaging statements about them to a recruitment agency, hindering their ability to find new work.
What You Should Know
- Keep a detailed, private log of all interactions you believe are dishonest or malicious, including dates, times, what was said, and who was present.
- Preserve all written communications, such as emails, text messages, or official letters, that could serve as evidence of the employer's misleading conduct or statements.
- Understand that a claim for bad faith is distinct from a wrongful dismissal claim; it focuses on the manner of treatment, not just the failure to give notice.
- Be mindful of the two-year limitation period in Ontario to commence a legal claim, which starts from the moment the bad faith conduct occurs or is discovered.
- Because these claims are complex and fact-specific, seeking an early consultation with an employment lawyer can help you determine if your employer's behaviour legally constitutes bad faith.
Featured Cases
Dore v. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario
2025 ONSC 1018 (CanLII) · 2025-02-18Professional Association Breach of Good Faith: Dore v. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario
A motion to strike and stay claims against a professional association for alleged breaches of good faith in processing an application for legal assistance. The case involves the application of the Bhasin v. Hrynew framework for good faith in contractual relationships and the impact of regulatory investigations on professional practice.
Amerato v. TST-CF Solutions LP
2022 ONSC 5339 (CanLII) · 2022-01-26Wrongful Dismissal: 18 Months' Notice Awarded for Demotion and Disability
Amerato v. TST-CF Solutions LP is a wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff was terminated without cause and offered a demotion. The court determined the termination was unequivocal, awarding 18 months' notice. Disability benefits were not deducted from damages, and the plaintiff's mitigation efforts were considered. No aggravated damages were awarded due to lack of evidence of bad faith or discrimination.
Yee v Hudson’s Bay Company
2021 ONSC 387 (CanLII) · 2021-01-18Wrongful Dismissal: 11.65 Years of Service, 16 Months Notice Awarded
A wrongful dismissal case where a 62-year-old employee with 11.65 years of service was terminated. The court applied Bardal factors to award 16 months' notice and granted damages for unpaid bonus and pension contributions, but found no evidence of bad faith.
Edmond v. Algonquin College
2018 ONSC 1898 (CanLII) · 2018-03-23Wrongful Dismissal: Proportionality of Cause-Based Termination
A wrongful dismissal case where the court assessed the proportionality of a dismissal for cause after nine years of satisfactory service. The court found the dismissal disproportionate and awarded 12 months' notice and damages for lost salary and benefits. The case also involved claims for breach of good faith and privacy rights, which proceeded to summary trial.
Villa v Association of Professional Engineers on Ontario
2017 ONSC 3277 (CanLII) · 2017-05-26Wrongful Dismissal: Leave to Amend Pleadings for Bad Faith Claims
A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff sought to amend his statement of claim to include allegations of bad faith and claims for moral, aggravated, and punitive damages. The court granted leave to amend, allowing the plaintiff to pursue claims for damages related to the employer's alleged bad faith conduct, including harassment and unwarranted disciplinary proceedings.
Jadubir v. Martinrea
2012 ONSC 1367 (CanLII) · 2012-03-29Wrongful Dismissal: 15-Year Toolmaker Awarded 12 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case where a 15-year employee was terminated as a Lead Hand toolmaker. The court determined a 12-month notice period based on Bardal factors and ruled on statutory interpretation, mitigation of damages, and bad faith claims. The plaintiff was awarded reasonable notice damages, including wages and overtime lost, with ESA payments deducted.
Covelli v. Sears Canada Inc.
2011 ONSC 1850 (CanLII) · 2011-03-23Wrongful Dismissal: Employer's Bad Faith Conduct and Punitive Damages
A wrongful dismissal case where an employer's alleged bad faith conduct in terminating an employee without proper basis led to claims for punitive and moral damages. The court considered whether systemic misconduct could support such awards and the relevance of discovery in such cases.
Jensen v. Schaeffler
2011 ONSC 781 (CanLII) · 2011-02-1028-Year Employee's Wrongful Dismissal: Reasonable Notice and Mental Distress
A wrongful dismissal case where a 28-year employee was terminated without cause due to physical limitations. The court debated the reasonable notice period, applied Bardal factors, and dismissed claims for mental distress and bad faith due to lack of evidence.
Zesta Engineering Ltd. v. Cloutier
2010 ONSC 5810 (CanLII) · 2010-10-21Wrongful Dismissal: 19-Year Employee Claims Moral and Compensatory Damages
A wrongful dismissal case involving an employee dismissed after 19 years of service. The employer's conduct, including intimidation and lack of severance, is scrutinized. The case also addresses fiduciary duties, conspiracy, injunctive relief, and punitive damages.
Mathieson v. Scotia Capital Inc.
2009 CanLII 64183 (ON SC) · 2009-11-18Wrongful Dismissal: 30-Year Employee Awarded 24 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case involving a plaintiff employed for over 30 years who was terminated at age 58. The court considered whether 24 months’ notice was appropriate under the Bardal factors and whether Wallace/Keays damages were available for economic loss absent bad faith. The defendant initially offered 18 months’ notice, later extended to 24 months. The court also addressed the fairness of a discretionary bonus awarded in 2006.
Lakeside Steel Corporation v. White
2007 CanLII 19424 (ON SC) · 2007-05-29Employment Termination Case: Bad Faith and Settlement Privilege Dispute
A merits decision involving an employment contract dispute regarding the termination of employment and alleged bad faith in the termination process. The court addressed whether discussions during a termination meeting were protected by settlement privilege and whether the paragraphs in the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim could be struck under Rule 25.11(b). The court declined to strike the paragraphs, as privilege could not be determined without factual findings.
Fedorowicz v. Pace Marathon Motor Lines Inc.
2006 CanLII 2403 (ON SC) · 2006-01-31Constructive Dismissal: 10 Months Notice Awarded with Wallace Damages
A constructive dismissal case where the plaintiff alleged unilateral changes to employment terms and lack of response to clarification requests. The court found constructive dismissal and awarded 10 months’ notice, including Wallace damages for bad faith conduct.
Downham v. Lennox (County)
2005 CanLII 45197 (ON SC) · 2005-12-05Wrongful Dismissal: Municipal Employee Awarded Damages for Bad Faith Termination
A wrongful dismissal case involving a municipal employee who was terminated for alleged misconduct in a housing management role. The court found the employee's conduct to be an isolated error in judgment, not justifying dismissal, and ruled that the employer failed to follow progressive discipline and relied on flawed investigations. The employer was also found to have acted in bad faith, leading to aggravated damages and defamation claims.
Flynn v. Shorcan Brokers Ltd.
2004 CanLII 2538 (ON SC) · 2004-07-12Fixed-Term Contracts and Termination: No Wrongful Dismissal Found
A merits decision involving the termination of employment where the plaintiff signed a series of fixed-term contracts from 1999 to 2002. The court upheld the fixed-term contracts as clear and unambiguous, found no wrongful dismissal, and denied punitive damages due to lack of oppressive conduct.
Bishop v. Beefeater (Niagara) Ltd.
2002 CanLII 15789 (ON SC) · 2002-10-23Wrongful Dismissal: 22-Month Employee Awarded 4 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff was terminated without cause after 22 months of employment. The court applied the Bardal factors to determine a reasonable notice period of four months, with one month added due to modest inducement. The employer's manner of dismissal was reviewed, but no bad faith was found. Claims for punitive, aggravated, and mental distress damages were dismissed as they were deemed to flow from the breach of contract itself.
Youkhanna v. Spina's Steel Workers Co.
2001 CanLII 28316 (ON SC) · 2001-11-06Wrongful Dismissal After Workplace Injury: Employee Awarded 3 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated after a workplace injury. The employer alleged economic reasons but failed to provide evidence, and the employee was entitled to three months’ notice due to the employer’s bad faith and lack of legitimate basis for termination. The employer also interfered with the employee’s ability to claim workers’ compensation by providing false information to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, which further supported an increased notice period.
Prinzo v. Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care
2000 CanLII 22610 (ON SC) · 2000-03-06Wrongful Dismissal: Managerial Employee Awarded 18 Months Notice and Damages
A wrongful dismissal case involving a managerial employee with 17 years of service who was dismissed due to financial constraints. The court found the employer’s conduct during the termination process to be in bad faith, awarded 18 months’ notice, $15,000 in aggravated damages, and $5,000 in punitive damages, applying principles from Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd.