Just Cause — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Just Cause
In Ontario employment law, a 'just cause' dismissal is often called the 'capital punishment' of employment law, and for good reason. It is the most severe form of termination, allowing an employer to end the employment relationship immediately, without providing any notice, termination pay, or severance pay. However, the bar for an employer to prove just cause is exceptionally high. It is reserved for only the most serious employee misconduct that fundamentally shatters the trust and viability of the employment relationship. This isn't about minor mistakes, occasional lateness, or failing to meet a performance target. Just cause requires conduct that is intentionally harmful, grossly negligent, or demonstrates a complete disregard for the employer's interests.
To establish just cause, an employer carries the heavy burden of proving that the employee's actions were so severe that termination was the only reasonable response. This is known as the principle of proportionality. A court will examine the context of the entire situation: the nature of the misconduct, the employee's role and responsibilities, their length of service, and their disciplinary history. For example, theft, fraud, serious insubordination, or violence in the workplace are common grounds for just cause allegations. In contrast, poor performance is rarely sufficient unless it amounts to gross incompetence and the employer has previously provided clear warnings and a chance for the employee to improve. Because an allegation of just cause is so serious and its consequences so significant, the specific facts of each case are intensely scrutinized. Understanding whether your employer's claim meets this high legal standard is a critical first step in protecting your rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of behaviour is considered just cause for termination in Ontario?
Just cause typically involves serious misconduct like theft, fraud, dishonesty, workplace violence, extreme insubordination, or a profound breach of a core company policy. The misconduct must be so severe that it irreparably damages the employment relationship.
Can my employer fire me for just cause for one mistake?
It's highly unlikely. For a single incident to be just cause, it must be exceptionally serious, like theft or assault. For lesser issues, courts expect employers to use progressive discipline, such as warnings, before resorting to termination.
If I'm fired for just cause, do I get any severance or termination pay?
No. If an employer successfully proves just cause, they are not obligated to provide notice of termination, pay in lieu of notice, or severance pay under either the Employment Standards Act, 2000 or common law.
My employer says they have just cause, but I disagree. What is the deadline to sue them?
In Ontario, you generally have two years from the date of your termination to file a civil lawsuit for wrongful dismissal. It is crucial to act quickly to ensure you do not miss this strict limitation period.
Is 'poor performance' the same as just cause?
No, not usually. To justify a just cause termination for poor performance, an employer must prove gross incompetence and show that they gave you clear, repeated warnings and a reasonable opportunity to improve, which you failed to do.
When should I contact an employment lawyer about a just cause dismissal?
You should contact a lawyer immediately. An allegation of just cause is a serious mark on your record that can affect future employment. A lawyer can assess the strength of your employer's case and advise you on whether you have a claim for wrongful dismissal.
My employer didn't fire me right away after they found out about the 'misconduct'. Can they still claim just cause?
Possibly not. If an employer knows about misconduct but waits too long to act, a court may find they have 'condoned' the behaviour, effectively losing their right to terminate for just cause based on that specific incident.
Common Scenarios
- A senior financial analyst is terminated for cause after being discovered to have committed insider trading using confidential company information.
- A construction foreman is fired immediately after physically threatening a subcontractor on a job site, in clear violation of the company's zero-tolerance violence policy.
- An employee with 15 years of service is fired for 'just cause' after being late three times in one month, with no prior disciplinary record for tardiness.
- A marketing manager is accused of just cause for submitting expense reports that contain minor, unintentional errors, which they offer to immediately correct.
- A retail worker is fired for cause after an internal investigation proves they were systematically voiding sales and pocketing the cash.
What You Should Know
Featured Cases
Paul v. Sensient Colors
2025 ONSC 3127 (CanLII) · 2025-05-26Wrongful Dismissal: Employee Terminated for Non-Compliance with Vaccination Policy
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for non-compliance with the employer's COVID-19 vaccination policy. The court found no just cause for termination and awarded 12 months' notice and $182,822.84 in damages, applying Bardal factors.
Lagala v. Patene Building Supplies Ltd
2024 ONSC 253 (CanLII) · 2024-01-11Wrongful Dismissal: Just Cause and Standard of Review
A wrongful dismissal case where the court reviewed the termination of an employee's employment based on just cause, focusing on the standard of review under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997.
Livshin v. The Clinic Network Canada Inc.
2021 ONSC 6796 (CanLII) · 2021-10-14Employment Termination: Compliance with ESA and Damages for Early Exit
A case involving the termination of an employment agreement, where the court examined the compliance of the termination clause with the Employment Standards Act, 2000, and the entitlement to damages and benefits for the remaining term of the contract. The court applied the Fred Deeley and Waksdale principles and considered the plaintiff's entitlement to travel allowance and benefits.
Nooks v. Toronto Transit Commission
2021 ONSC 3383 (CanLII) · 2021-04-29Wrongful Dismissal: Just Cause and Employment Standards Act
A wrongful dismissal case where the court considered whether just cause existed for the termination of an employee's employment. The case also involved evidence and the Employment Standards Act, 2000.
Headley v. City of Toronto
2019 ONSC 4496 (CanLII) · 2019-08-27Wrongful Dismissal: City of Toronto Employee Awarded 18 Months Notice and Damages
A wrongful dismissal case where the employer failed to prove just cause for terminating an employee due to alleged theft and fraud. The court awarded 18 months' notice and damages for mental distress and financial loss, but did not grant punitive damages.
Johnston v. The Corporation of the Municipality of Arran-Elderslie
2018 ONSC 7616 (CanLII) · 2018-12-19Wrongful Dismissal: Chief Building Official Awarded Damages
A wrongful dismissal case where a Chief Building Official was terminated without notice by the Municipality of Arran-Elderslie. The court found the termination wrongful due to the employer's failure to provide just cause, estoppel, and breach of contract. Aggravated and punitive damages were awarded for the manner of dismissal and mental distress.
Sankreacha v. Cameron J. and Beach Sales Ltd.
2018 ONSC 7216 (CanLII) · 2018-12-03Wrongful Dismissal: Spyware Installation Justified Termination
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for installing spyware on the employer’s computer. The court applied the McKinley v. BC Tel framework to determine that the dismissal was justified due to the breach of trust inherent in the employment relationship. Other claims, including inducing breach of contract, injurious falsehood, and civil conspiracy, were dismissed due to lack of evidence.
Belsito v. 2220742 Ontario Ltd.
2017 ONSC 7207 (CanLII) · 2017-12-01Termination for Cause: Disputed Facts Require Trial
A termination for cause case where the court ruled that material facts were in dispute, requiring a trial to determine just cause and entitlement to RRSP contributions. The employer's burden to establish just cause was considered, along with procedural fairness and the admissibility of evidence.
Filion v The Religious Hospitallers of St. Joseph of Cornwall, Ontario
2016 ONSC 1008 (CanLII) · 2016-11-08Wrongful Dismissal: Just Cause and Summary Judgment Dismissed
A wrongful dismissal case where the court dismissed a motion for summary judgment, finding genuine issues requiring a trial. The case also addresses the admissibility of post-termination evidence and the application of the McKinley v. B.C. Tel framework.
Cassell v. Irving H. Miller Limited
2016 ONSC 5570 (CanLII) · 2016-09-13Wrongful Dismissal: Insurance Broker's 15 Months Notice and Damages Awarded
A wrongful dismissal case involving an insurance broker dismissed for alleged dishonesty and breach of duties. The court applied the McKinley v. BC Tel framework to determine just cause and awarded 15 months' notice based on Bardal factors. The case also addressed the breach of a non-competition clause and fiduciary duty, with the employer winning damages for lost commissions. The court also dismissed claims of conspiracy, intimidation, and slander.
Johar v Best Buy Canada
2016 ONSC 5287 (CanLII) · 2016-08-31Wrongful Dismissal: Employee Terminated for Conflict of Interest and Dishonesty
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for alleged conflict of interest and dishonesty. The court found the employer failed to prove just cause and awarded 11 months' notice period and $55,796.29 in damages, considering the plaintiff's efforts to mitigate.
Mr. De Jesus v Linamar Corporation
2016 ONSC 4383 (CanLII) · 2016-07-18Wrongful Dismissal: Production of Defective Parts Justified Termination
A wrongful dismissal case where the court determined that the production of defective parts by the plaintiff constituted misconduct sufficient to justify termination for cause. The court also awarded 15 months' notice and rejected punitive damages. The case considered the plaintiff's age, length of service, and the employer's financial risk.
Martin v Munsee Delaware First Nation, Fisher and Peters
2016 ONSC 620 (CanLII) · 2016-04-27Wrongful Dismissal: Band Administrator Terminated for Financial Misconduct
A wrongful dismissal case involving a band administrator terminated for alleged financial misconduct. The court upheld the termination as a proportionate response to repeated financial breaches, applying the McKinley v. BCTel framework. The administrator also counterclaimed for misappropriation of funds, which was partially allowed.
Armstong v Lendon
2015 ONSC 3004 (CanLII) · 2015-05-2526-Year Legal Secretary Awarded 21 Months Notice in Wrongful Dismissal
A wrongful dismissal case involving a legal secretary with 26 years of service who was terminated. The court awarded 21 months' notice period based on Bardal factors and $7,500 in aggravated damages for harm to dignity and reputation, finding no just cause for dismissal.
Violo v. Delphi Communications Inc.
2014 ONSC 7008 (CanLII) · 2014-12-0429-Year Employee Wrongfully Dismissed: 15 Months' Notice and $45,250 in Damages
A wrongful dismissal case where a plaintiff with 29 years of employment was dismissed after allegations of chronic lateness, alcoholism, and discourteous behavior. The court applied a contextual approach to just cause and awarded 15 months' notice. The plaintiff was also awarded $45,250 in damages for wrongful dismissal and $30,000 in costs for the defendant's non-appearance.
Hoang v. Mann
2014 ONSC 3762 (CanLII) · 2014-08-22Wrongful Dismissal: Employee Terminated for Poor Performance and Insubordination
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for poor performance, insubordination, and unprofessional conduct. The court found the employer justified in terminating the employee for cause and ruled that an unsigned amended offer letter was unenforceable, denying the employee commission entitlement.
Chopra v. Easy Plastic Containers Limited
2014 ONSC 3666 (CanLII) · 2014-06-19Wrongful Dismissal: Just Cause and Reasonable Notice Determined
A wrongful dismissal case where the court determined the employer had just cause based on cumulative misconduct. The court also considered reasonable notice, mitigation of damages, and whether the plaintiff failed to mitigate his damages. Aggravated damages were not awarded due to no independent actionable wrong, and punitive damages for reprisal were also dismissed.
Ahmed v. Concord Hard Chrome Limited
2014 ONSC 3252 (CanLII) · 2014-05-28Wrongful Dismissal: Just Cause and Mitigation in Employment Case
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated after an argument over statutory holiday pay. The court determined the employer lacked just cause, awarded six months' notice, and reduced damages based on the plaintiff's mitigation efforts.
Gregory Smith v. Diversity Technologies Corporation
2014 ONSC 2460 (CanLII) · 2014-04-17Wrongful Dismissal: Termination Without Just Cause and Summary Judgment
A wrongful dismissal case where an employee was terminated for insubordination and breach of company policy. The court found the termination unjustified due to the employer's failure to provide documented warnings. The employee was entitled to 12 months' notice or pay in lieu, and the court granted summary judgment, finding the employment contract enforceable.
Simpson v. Global Warranty Management Corporation
2014 ONSC 724 (CanLII) · 2014-02-04Wrongful Dismissal: 64-Year-Old Employee Awarded 8 Months' Notice
A wrongful dismissal case where a 64-year-old employee with seven years of non-managerial service was dismissed without just cause. The court determined the appropriate notice period was 10 months, reduced by two months for inadequate mitigation, resulting in damages equivalent to eight months' notice less statutory payments.