Charter of Rights — Ontario Employment Law

34 casesDecisions from 1982–2021

About Charter of Rights

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a cornerstone of Canadian law, but its direct application in the workplace can be confusing for many Ontario employees. The most critical thing to understand is that the Charter primarily applies to 'government action.' This means it protects your rights from infringement by the federal, provincial, and municipal governments, as well as entities that are effectively an extension of government, such as Crown corporations, public school boards, and police services. It does not typically apply directly to private-sector employers.

For public sector employees in Ontario, the Charter can be a powerful tool. For instance, Section 15 guarantees the right to equality, protecting against discrimination based on grounds like age, sex, race, or disability. This could be used to challenge a mandatory retirement policy imposed by a city (a government body) or discriminatory hiring practices at a provincial agency. Section 2 of the Charter protects fundamental freedoms, including freedom of association, which is highly relevant in the context of collective bargaining for unionized public sector workers.

So, what about the vast majority of employees who work for private companies? While you cannot sue a private employer directly for a 'Charter violation,' the Charter's principles have a significant indirect effect. All Ontario legislation, including the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) and the Ontario Human Rights Code (OHRC), must comply with the Charter. If a provision in one of these laws were found to violate a Charter right, it could be struck down by a court, changing the law for everyone. For most day-to-day workplace issues like discrimination in a private company, your primary protection comes from the OHRC, not the Charter. Understanding which legal framework applies to your specific employment situation is a complex but crucial first step, and the nuances often require guidance from a legal professional.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue my private-sector boss for violating my Charter rights in Ontario?

Generally, no. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies to government actions and laws, not directly to private individuals or companies. Your claim against a private employer for issues like discrimination would typically fall under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

What's the main difference between a Charter claim and a Human Rights Code claim?

The key difference is who they apply to. The Charter applies to government actors, while the Ontario Human Rights Code (OHRC) applies to all employers in the province, public and private. The procedures and remedies available also differ significantly between the two.

I work for the government and am in a union. Where do I bring a Charter claim?

This is a complex jurisdictional issue. A labour arbitrator appointed under your collective agreement may have the authority to hear and decide on Charter issues. In some cases, a court may be the appropriate venue. This determination is highly fact-specific and requires legal analysis.

Does the Charter protect my seniority rights at work?

No, courts have consistently ruled that seniority is a contractual right typically established through a collective agreement, not a constitutionally protected right under the Charter.

Is there a time limit to start a Charter claim related to my employment?

Yes, legal claims are subject to limitation periods. For many Charter claims, the two-year period under Ontario's Limitations Act, 2002 may apply, but the exact deadline can be complex. You should seek legal advice as soon as possible to avoid missing a deadline.

Can a government employer's mandatory retirement policy be challenged under the Charter?

Yes, a mandatory retirement policy imposed by a government body can be challenged as a form of age discrimination under Section 15 of the Charter. The government would then have to justify the policy as a reasonable limit under Section 1.

When should I consult an employment lawyer about a potential Charter issue?

You should consult a lawyer immediately if you believe a government employer or a specific law has violated your constitutional rights. Charter litigation is a highly specialized area of law, and early advice is critical to determine if you have a case and the correct legal path to follow.

Common Scenarios

  • A municipal firefighter is subject to a mandatory retirement policy at age 60 and wants to challenge it as age discrimination under Section 15 of the Charter.
  • A high school teacher at a public school is disciplined for their off-duty political activism, raising questions about their freedom of expression under the Charter.
  • A union representing provincial hydro workers challenges new legislation that restricts their right to strike, arguing it infringes on their freedom of association.
  • A police officer files a lawsuit against their police service, a public body, alleging systemic racial discrimination that violates their equality rights.
  • An employee of a federal Crown corporation is terminated and believes the internal appeal process was procedurally unfair and violated their constitutional rights.

What You Should Know

Featured Cases

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v. Toronto Transit Commission

2021 ONSC 7658 (CanLII) · 2021-11-20

Mandatory Vaccination Policies: Labour Arbitration and Charter Rights

A labour arbitration case involving unionized employees challenging mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies enforced by their employer. The court is considering whether to intervene in the dispute, balancing individual rights with public health and workplace safety, and whether such policies infringe on constitutional rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

charter of rights grievance arbitration labour and employment mandatory vaccination policy

De Facendis v. Toronto Parking Authority

2021 ONSC 1695 (CanLII) · 2021-03-08

Workplace Sexual Harassment: Arbitration Jurisdiction and Charter Rights

A unionized employee alleged sexual harassment and assault by a co-worker, leading to a dispute over the jurisdiction of labour arbitrators under the Labour Relations Act. The court affirmed the arbitrators' jurisdiction, interpreting section 48(1) to include workplace sexual assault claims and found no violation of the Charter of Rights regarding sex discrimination.

charter of rights collective agreements grievance arbitration jurisdiction workplace sexual harassment

Rivers v. Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

2018 ONSC 4307 (CanLII) · 2018-07-13

Workplace Discrimination: Gender-Based Harassment in Police Services

A class action lawsuit challenging systemic gender-based discrimination and harassment in the Waterloo Regional Police Services Board. The court must determine its jurisdiction over workplace disputes governed by collective agreements and the Police Services Act, as well as whether claims of Charter breaches can be adjudicated in civil court.

charter of rights class action gender-based discrimination jurisdiction workplace disputes

Cherrier v. Attorney General of Canada

2017 ONSC 7336 (CanLII) · 2017-12-07

Seniority Rights and Charter of Rights in Employment

A constitutional challenge regarding seniority rights in employment was heard, where the court ruled that seniority based on date of hire is not a protected right under the Charter. The court also addressed jurisdiction and limitations issues but found no Charter violation.

charter of rights collective bargaining constitution seniority rights

Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. Canada (Attorney General)

2009 CanLII 15149 (ON SC) · 2009-04-06

RCMP Staff Relations Program Challenged for Infringing Collective Bargaining Rights

A labour and employment case involving RCMP members challenging the Staff Relations Representative Program (SRRP) under section 96 of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Regulations, 1988, for infringing their freedom to engage in collective bargaining under section 2(d) of the Charter. The court found the SRRP to infringe the Charter but determined the infringement was not justified under section 1.

charter of rights collective bargaining employment regulations freedom of association labour and employment

General Motors of Canada Limited v. Canadian Auto Workers Union, Local 222

2008 CanLII 28750 (ON SC) · 2008-06-13

Labour Dispute: Injunction Request Over Union Blockade and Plant Closure

A labour dispute involving a union blockade and motorcade in response to a plant closure announcement. The employer sought an injunction to end the blockade, raising issues about the balance of convenience, clean hands doctrine, and whether the union's actions caused irreparable harm or infringed on freedom of expression under the Charter.

charter of rights collective agreements equitable relief labour and employment labour disputes

Wilde v. Welland (City)

2006 CanLII 21074 (ON SC) · 2006-06-22

Age Discrimination: Interim Injunction Allows Employee to Remain Employed Beyond 65

A wrongful dismissal and age discrimination case where an employee, employed as Fleet Supervisor, sought to remain employed beyond age 65 despite the respondent's policy of retirement at 65. The court granted an interim injunction to allow the applicant to remain employed pending appeal, citing the balance of convenience and the serious constitutional issue of age discrimination under Section 15(1) of the Charter.

age discrimination balance of convenience charter of rights employment status interim injunction

Quereshi v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission)

2006 CanLII 63686 (ON SC) · 2006-04-25

Human Rights Discrimination Case: Remedies Upheld by Tribunal

A human rights tribunal case addressing remedies for discrimination, including pension benefits, sick leave credits, lost income, and general damages. The tribunal's findings on remedies were upheld as reasonable, and the Charter challenge to section 41(4) of the Ontario Human Rights Code was dismissed.

charter of rights human rights code human rights tribunal remedies for discrimination workplace discrimination

Fraser v. Ontario (Attorney General)

2006 CanLII 121 (ON SC) · 2006-01-10

Agricultural Workers' Labour Rights: Charter Challenge to Exclusion from Collective Bargaining

A labour relations case involving agricultural workers challenging their exclusion from collective bargaining rights under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (LRA) and the adequacy of the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002 (AEPA) in protecting their right to associate and organize under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 2(d). The court found that the AEPA meets minimum constitutional standards for freedom of association and that the exclusion of agricultural workers from the LRA does not constitute discrimination under section 15 of the Charter.

agricultural workers charter of rights freedom of association labour and employment labour relations

Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General)

2005 CanLII 47783 (ON SC) · 2005-12-23

Employment Insurance and SAWP Workers: Charter Discrimination Case

A case involving the application of the Employment Insurance Act to SAWP workers, who are required to pay EI premiums but cannot access regular benefits. The court examined whether this differential treatment violates section 15 of the Charter and whether the UFCW has public interest standing to challenge the policy. The motion to strike was dismissed as the application raised justiciable issues.

charter of rights discrimination employment contract employment insurance public interest standing

Grover v. Canada (Attorney General)

2005 CanLII 63813 (ON SC) · 2005-09-06

Workplace Discrimination Case: Standing to Claim for Other Employees Struck Down

A workplace discrimination case where the plaintiff alleged systemic discrimination against other racialized employees and personal discrimination. The court ruled that the plaintiff lacked standing to claim remedies for unidentified employees and struck out portions of the pleading that exceeded the plaintiff’s personal claims.

canadian human rights act charter of rights standing striking out pleadings workplace discrimination

Cross v. Sullivan

2003 CanLII 44082 (ON SC) · 2003-06-30

Military Personnel Fiduciary Duty and Charter Claims

A merits decision involving a military personnel's claim of breach of fiduciary duty and Charter violations, including allegations of false evaluations and mishandling of grievances. Leave to amend was granted for fiduciary duty and Charter claims but denied for statutory duty claims.

breach of statutory duty charter of rights fiduciary duties leave to amend military personnel

O.T.F. v. Ontario (Attorney General)

1998 CanLII 14738 (ON SC) · 1998-03-17

Collective Bargaining Rights: Exclusion of Principals from Teachers' Bargaining Units

A case addressing whether the exclusion of principals and vice-principals from teachers' bargaining units violates constitutional rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including freedom of association, expression, and equality rights. The court examined whether the exclusion was discriminatory or punitive and concluded that no violation of these rights occurred.

charter of rights collective bargaining equality rights freedom of association labour and employment

Krznaric v. Chevrette

1997 CanLII 12426 (ON SC) · 1997-11-13

Police Officer Disability Accommodation Case: Damages Awarded for Charter Breach

A wrongful dismissal case involving a police officer diagnosed with multiple sclerosis who requested 8-hour shifts but was denied. The court found that the Police Services Board failed to accommodate the officer's disability without undue hardship, upholding the duty to accommodate under the Police Services Act and Human Rights Code. Damages were awarded for the Charter breach.

charter of rights duty to accommodate human rights code police services act workplace discrimination

Service Employees International Union, Local 204 v. Ontario (Attorney General)

1997 CanLII 12286 (ON SC) · 1997-09-05

Pay Equity Discrimination Case: Schedule J Declared Unconstitutional

A constitutional challenge to Schedule J of the Savings and Restructuring Act, 1996, which repealed the proxy method of pay equity and capped adjustments at 3% of payroll. The case examines whether this legislation discriminates against women in predominantly female workplaces under section 15(1) of the Charter and whether section 15(2) shields such legislation from challenges by members of the disadvantaged group it was designed to benefit.

charter of rights pay equity section 15(1) section 15(2) workplace discrimination

Ferrell v. Ontario (Attorney General)

1997 CanLII 12351 (ON SC) · 1997-07-09

Employment Equity Repeal and Section 15 Charter Violation

A case involving the repeal of the Employment Equity Act, 1993, and whether it violated section 15 of the Charter by creating a discriminatory environment. The courts ruled that the repeal did not violate the Charter as it restored the pre-existing legal framework.

charter of rights discrimination employment equity repeal of legislation section 15

Schafer v. Canada (Attorney General)

1996 CanLII 8150 (ON SC) · 1996-05-31

Unemployment Insurance Discrimination: Adoptive Parents Receive Fewer Benefits

A case addressing whether provisions of the Unemployment Insurance Act that provide unequal benefits to adoptive parents compared to biological parents violate section 15(1) of the Charter. The court found the discriminatory provisions not justified under section 1 of the Charter and issued a declaration of invalidity for the affected sections.

charter of rights discrimination equality rights parental benefits unemployment insurance

Saraga v. Wellington (County) Board of Education

1995 CanLII 7280 (ON SC) · 1995-06-09

Wrongful Dismissal and Charter Violations in Employment Context

A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff alleged violations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, sections 7 and 15, based on discrimination and procedural fairness. The defendant argued the court lacked jurisdiction due to the collective agreement's grievance procedures. The court ruled that civil courts retain jurisdiction over Charter claims even with a collective agreement in place.

charter of rights collective agreements discrimination jurisdiction wrongful dismissal

Canada Post Corp. v. C.U.P.W.

1991 CanLII 8320 (ON SC) · 1991-09-16

Labour Dispute: Picketing and Interference with Employer Operations

A labour dispute involving union members and sympathizers picketing Canada Post facilities, raising questions about the legality of obstructing access to employer premises and whether such actions are protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The court ruled that picketing intended to shut down operations is unlawful and that the Charter does not apply to freely negotiated collective agreements.

charter of rights freedom of expression interference with employer operations labour and employment picketing

Arlington Crane Service Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour) (H.C.J.)

1988 CanLII 4802 (ON SC) · 1988-12-22

Charter Challenge to Province-Wide Collective Bargaining in Construction Industry

A legal challenge to the province-wide collective bargaining scheme in the construction industry, specifically the I.C.I. sector, and whether it violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including issues related to freedom of association, closed-shop provisions, and equality rights.

charter of rights closed-shop provisions collective bargaining freedom of association labour relations