Loss of Benefits — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Loss of Benefits
When an employee is terminated in Ontario, the financial impact extends far beyond the loss of a regular salary. The "loss of benefits" represents a significant portion of an employee's total compensation, encompassing health and dental coverage, life insurance, retirement savings or pension contributions, car allowances, and disability coverage. Under Ontario law, securing compensation for these lost benefits is a critical part of a wrongful dismissal claim and severance negotiations.
Ontario employment law treats the loss of benefits differently depending on the time frame being examined. During the minimum statutory notice period required by the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), an employer is strictly legally mandated to continue the employee's regular benefit plan contributions. They cannot simply buy out the benefits or cut them off immediately. If the employer fails to maintain these benefits during the ESA notice period, they are operating in direct violation of basic provincial employment standards.
Beyond this minimum statutory period, most non-unionized employees are entitled to a longer "reasonable notice period" under common law. While employers are not usually required to keep the dismissed employee on the active benefits plan for this entire extended duration, they are obligated to compensate the employee for the financial loss of those benefits. Courts in Ontario generally award damages for lost benefits in one of two ways. The most common method compensates the employee for the cost the employer would have paid in premiums for the duration of the notice period. Alternatively, if the employee actually incurs medical or dental expenses that would have otherwise been covered, or if they secure private replacement insurance, the court may order the employer to fully reimburse those specific out-of-pocket costs.
Employers frequently attempt to argue that an employee is not entitled to benefits during the common law notice period by pointing to limitation clauses in the employment contract or the proprietary benefit plan text. However, Ontario courts have consistently ruled that unless the contractual language unambiguously excludes common law entitlements and explicitly limits benefits upon termination, the employee remains entitled to their value. Because assessing the exact true value of fringe compensation and interpreting complex plan texts is highly dependent on individual circumstances, it is generally recommended to have an employment lawyer evaluate your total compensation package before signing a severance release.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can my employer cut off my health benefits the day I am fired?
No. Under the Ontario Employment Standards Act (ESA), your employer must continue to make all benefit plan contributions during your statutory notice period. Cutting off health, dental, or life insurance immediately upon termination violates these minimum legal requirements.
How do courts calculate the value of lost benefits?
Courts typically calculate the loss either by awarding the monetary value of the premiums the employer would have paid during your reasonable notice period, or by compensating you for actual out-of-pocket medical expenses you incurred that would have been covered by the plan.
Am I entitled to lost pension contributions if I am let go?
Yes. If your employer matched RRSP contributions or paid into a pension plan, the loss of these contributions during your common law notice period is generally considered a recoverable damage in a wrongful dismissal claim, provided the plan text doesn't strictly and lawfully exclude it.
What happens if I get sick after my benefits are wrongfully cancelled?
If an employer unlawfully cancels your benefits and you subsequently incur substantial health costs or become disabled during what should have been your notice period, the employer could be held entirely liable for replacing the medical costs or the disability payments you would have received from the insurer.
When is the right time to consult a legal professional about my lost benefits?
You should seek a legal review immediately if you receive a severance offer that only calculates your payout based on your base salary, ignoring the value of your medical, pension, and vehicle allowances. An advocate can help determine if the offer drastically undercuts your true common law entitlements.
Do I need to buy a private replacement health plan?
While not strictly mandatory, purchasing substitute coverage helps fulfill your duty to mitigate damages. If you pay out-of-pocket for a private replacement plan, you can claim those monthly premium costs as part of your wrongful dismissal damages.
Common Scenarios
- A senior manager with 20 years of service is let go without cause. The employer offers 18 months of base pay as severance but completely excludes compensation for the company's generous 5% RRSP matching program, depriving the employee of tens of thousands in retirement growth.
- Days after being terminated and having their dental benefits abruptly cancelled in violation of the ESA, an employee's child requires a $4,000 emergency orthodontic procedure that would have been 100% covered under the employer's plan.
- A worker receives a severance package that claims to encompass all common law entitlements. However, the package fails to account for the $1,200 monthly vehicle allowance and $200 monthly gym membership the employee received as steady, non-discretionary perks while actively employed.
- An administrative assistant is dismissed and has their long-term disability (LTD) premiums stopped immediately. Two months into their job search, they suffer a severe accident and realize they have no LTD coverage because the employer prematurely severed the policy.
What You Should Know
- Retain all receipts and invoices for medical, dental, or prescription expenses you incur after being terminated, as these may be fully reimbursable if your benefits were cut off prematurely.
- Never accept a severance package based solely on your hourly wage or base salary; calculate your 'total compensation,' which includes the cash value of all health, retirement, and lifestyle benefits.
- If you purchase a private health insurance plan to bridge the gap while looking for new work, keep careful records of the monthly premiums to include them in your severance negotiations.
- Ask a legal representative to formally request and review the actual underlying insurance benefit plan texts from your employer; vague clauses in your simple employment contract are often not enough to legally strip you of your benefits during the notice period.
Featured Cases
T. v. Aurora Hotel Group
2024 ONCA 213 (CanLII) · 2024-03-20Wrongful Dismissal Appeal: Mitigation and Damages Upheld
This is an appeal from a wrongful dismissal trial decision regarding the calculation of damages. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge's determination that the employee made reasonable efforts to mitigate losses, the award for lost benefits, and the moral damages awarded for the manner of dismissal.
G. v. Ciena Canada, ULC
2024 ONSC 865 (CanLII) · 2024-02-08Wrongful Dismissal: 22-Year Employee Awarded 24 Months Notice
This wrongful dismissal case involved a plaintiff aged 58 with 22 years of service who was terminated without cause. The court determined that 24 months was the reasonable notice period, rejecting the argument for exceptional circumstances to extend it further. Damages were awarded for lost bonuses based on actual corporate performance, $25,000 annually for lost benefits, and accrued vacation pay based on base salary, while finding the plaintiff had reasonably mitigated damages.
W. v. Air Canada
2022 ONSC 6616 (CanLII) · 2022-11-25Wrongful Dismissal: 24 Months Notice Awarded During Pandemic
This wrongful dismissal case involved a long-term employee terminated during the COVID-19 pandemic who was awarded 24 months' notice based on the Bardal factors, including age, tenure, and economic uncertainty. The court awarded damages for lost group benefits and pension contributions, finding the employer failed to unambiguously exclude common law entitlements, but dismissed claims for discretionary travel privileges and service awards. The employer's burden to prove failure to mitigate was not met, considering the pandemic context.
D. v. Imperial Oil Limited
2018 ONSC 4345 (CanLII) · 2018-07-13Wrongful Dismissal: Pension & Benefits Damages
This wrongful dismissal case addressed the quantification of damages regarding pension contributions, savings plan contributions, and loss of employment benefits. The court applied IBM Canada Limited v. Waterman principles to determine that no damages were awarded for pension contributions where no pension loss occurred, but plaintiffs were entitled to damages for Savings Plan contributions and lost benefits.
S. v. Nordstrong Equipment Limited
2018 ONCA 364 (CanLII) · 2018-04-13Appeal Allowed: Bonus & Benefits Added to 17-Month Notice
The Court of Appeal allowed the employee's appeal. The court found the motion judge erred in rejecting the claims for lost benefits and a bonus over the notice period. While the 17-month notice period was undisturbed, the court awarded the employee an additional $9,458 for lost benefits and $166,945 for the lost bonus during that period.
L. v. Stelcrete Industries Ltd.
2013 ONSC 7495 (CanLII) · 2013-12-05Wrongful Dismissal: 11-Year Employee Awarded 12 Months Notice
This wrongful dismissal case involved an employee with 11 years of service who was terminated without notice following allegations of anti-Semitic remarks. The court found the employer failed to prove just cause due to unreliable witness testimony and a lack of independent investigation, applying the Bardal factors to determine a 12-month notice period. The court also awarded damages for lost health benefits and found the employee had reasonably mitigated damages by taking lower-paying employment.
P. v. Whirlpool Corporation
2011 ONSC 4100 (CanLII) · 2011-06-30Wrongful Dismissal: 17-Year Employee Awarded 19 Months Notice
This wrongful dismissal case involved a senior employee with 17 years of service who was terminated without cause. The court awarded 19 months' notice based on Bardal factors and ruled that the employer failed to prove the plaintiff's mitigation efforts were unreasonable. Additionally, the plaintiff was entitled to non-discretionary bonuses and the pecuniary value of lost benefits during the notice period.
M. v. Canac Kitchens Ltd.
2009 CanLII 1369 (ON SC) · 2009-01-12Wrongful Dismissal: Supervisory Employee Awarded 18 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case where a long-term employee in a supervisory role was terminated without cause due to a downturn in the employer's business. The court awarded 18 months' notice, damages for loss of benefits valued at $72.47 per month, and a lump-sum payment of $50,000 in lieu of monthly payments, applying the mitigation of damages principle.
G. v. Kohler Ltd.
2009 CanLII 593 (ON SC) · 2009-01-07Wrongful Dismissal: 13-Year Team Leader Awarded 12 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case where a plaintiff with 13 years of service as a Team Leader was terminated without cause. The court awarded 12 months’ notice based on length of service, age, and difficulty finding comparable employment. The plaintiff was also awarded damages for overtime earnings, lost benefits, and vocational counselling costs.
S. v. SDS Kerr Beavers Dental
2007 ONCA 543 (CanLII) · 2007-07-26Wrongful Dismissal: 16-Year Employee Awarded 13 Months Notice
The Court of Appeal dismissed the employer's appeal in a wrongful dismissal action where the trial judge found that sexual harassment allegations did not establish just cause for termination. The court upheld the trial judge's award of thirteen months' notice, which included a modest Wallace extension for bad faith conduct, and compensation for lost benefits.
K. v. Goldcorp. Inc.
1995 CanLII 7276 (ON SC) · 1995-01-10Wrongful Dismissal: 35-Year Employee Awarded 24 Months Notice
A wrongful dismissal case involving a plaintiff with 35 years of service who was terminated without cause. The court considered the appropriate period of reasonable notice, damages for lost benefits, and whether statutory severance pay under the Employment Standards Act provides additional compensation beyond common law damages. The court awarded 24 months of reasonable notice and determined that lost benefits are compensable.