Temporary Layoff — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Temporary Layoff
Many Ontario workers and employers mistakenly believe that a temporary layoff is an employer's automatic right when business slows down. However, the reality under Ontario law is far more complex. A temporary layoff is a period where an employee is not working and not being paid, but the employment relationship is not formally terminated. The rules governing these situations are found in two parallel systems: the minimum standards of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) and the principles of common law.
The ESA defines a temporary layoff and sets maximum durations. Generally, a layoff is 'temporary' if it lasts no more than 13 weeks in any consecutive 20-week period. This can be extended up to 35 weeks in any 52-week period if the employer continues to make substantial benefit plan payments. If a layoff exceeds these limits, the ESA deems the employment terminated, and the employee is owed statutory termination and severance pay.
Crucially, however, the common law provides a different and often more protective standard. At common law, an employer has no right to temporarily lay off an employee unless that right is explicitly stated in a clear and enforceable employment contract. If there is no such contractual term, any unilateral layoff by the employer is a substantial breach of the employment agreement. This breach can be treated by the employee as a constructive dismissal, entitling them to resign and sue for wrongful dismissal damages, which are typically far greater than ESA minimums. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced a temporary exception through the Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL) regulation, which deemed certain pandemic-related layoffs not to be a constructive dismissal under the ESA, but this was a specific and unusual measure. Because your rights depend heavily on your contract and the specific facts, having a legal professional review your layoff notice can be a critical first step in protecting your interests.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long can a temporary layoff last in Ontario under the ESA?
Under Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000, a temporary layoff can last up to 13 weeks in any 20-week period. It can be extended to 35 weeks in a 52-week period if the employer continues substantial payments for benefits like health or pension plans.
My employer laid me off but my contract doesn't mention layoffs. What can I do?
If your employment contract does not give your employer the explicit right to lay you off, the layoff is likely a constructive dismissal at common law. You may have the right to treat your employment as terminated and pursue a claim for wrongful dismissal damages, including a notice period.
What happens if my temporary layoff lasts longer than the legal limit?
If a temporary layoff exceeds the time limits set by the ESA (e.g., 13 weeks without benefits continuation), your employment is considered terminated on the first day of the layoff. Your employer would then owe you statutory termination and potentially severance pay.
Do I have to accept a temporary layoff from my employer?
No, you do not have to accept it if your contract doesn't allow for it. You have a choice: you can either accept the layoff and wait to be recalled, or you can treat it as a constructive dismissal and seek compensation. Accepting it may prevent you from making a claim later.
Does my employer have to continue my health benefits during a layoff?
Not necessarily for a short layoff (under 13 weeks), but they must continue them to extend a layoff beyond 13 weeks under the ESA. The terms of your employment contract and benefits plan will ultimately determine the specific obligations.
When should I contact an employment lawyer about a temporary layoff?
You should consider contacting an employment lawyer as soon as you receive a layoff notice. They can review your contract, explain your options (accepting the layoff vs. claiming constructive dismissal), and help you understand the deadlines before you take any action that could affect your rights.
Can my employer reduce my pay or hours and call it a temporary layoff?
A significant, non-consensual reduction in hours or pay can also be a constructive dismissal, similar to a full layoff. A temporary layoff under the ESA specifically refers to a period where you are not working at all, not just working reduced hours.
Common Scenarios
- A construction company lays off several labourers for the winter season, which is a well-established and accepted practice in their industry and part of their collective agreement.
- A tech company, facing a funding shortfall, places a software developer on an unpaid 'temporary layoff' for 12 weeks. The developer's employment contract has no clause permitting layoffs.
- A retail store manager is told their hours are being reduced to zero until a new shipment arrives in 'a few weeks', but the employer provides no firm recall date.
- An employee at a manufacturing plant is laid off for 14 weeks. The employer did not continue their benefits, automatically triggering a termination under the ESA on the first day of the layoff.
- An administrative assistant is laid off, and her employment agreement has a vague clause stating the employer 'may implement layoffs as required by business needs'.
What You Should Know
- Immediately locate and carefully review your employment contract. The presence or absence of a clause permitting temporary layoffs is the single most important factor in determining your rights.
- Be cautious about what you sign. If your employer asks you to sign a letter agreeing to the layoff, doing so may waive your right to claim constructive dismissal.
- Document everything. Keep copies of the layoff notice, any emails or letters from your employer, and notes of any verbal conversations about the layoff's duration and terms.
- Understand the deadlines. If you intend to claim constructive dismissal, you must act promptly after the layoff begins. Delaying can be interpreted as acceptance of the new terms.
- Seek a legal consultation before making a decision. An employment lawyer can clarify whether your layoff constitutes a constructive dismissal and help you calculate the potential compensation you could be owed.
Featured Cases
Taylor v. Hanley Hospitality Inc.
2021 ONSC 3135 (CanLII) · 2021-06-07Constructive Dismissal During COVID-19 Pandemic: Layoffs and Employment Standards
A constructive dismissal case involving temporary layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court ruled that layoffs related to the pandemic are deemed Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL) under the ESA, displacing common law claims of constructive dismissal.
Fogelman v. IFG
2021 ONSC 4042 (CanLII) · 2021-06-02Constructive Dismissal and Wrongful Dismissal: Layoff and Employment Contract Dispute
A case involving the determination of employment status, a temporary layoff, and the enforceability of an employment contract. The court also assessed damages for wrongful dismissal, including notice period, vacation pay, and punitive damages for the employer's bad faith conduct.
Coutinho v. Ocular Health Centre Ltd.
2021 ONSC 3076 (CanLII) · 2021-04-27Constructive Dismissal: Layoff During Pandemic and Termination Pay
A constructive dismissal case involving an employer-imposed temporary layoff without pay during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court dismissed the defendant's motion for summary judgment, finding no genuine issue regarding constructive dismissal or mitigation defenses, and ordered the employer to pay statutory termination pay.
Popescu v Wittman Canada Inc.
2017 ONSC 3252 (CanLII) · 2017-05-26Constructive Dismissal: Lay-Off Without Contractual Basis
A constructive dismissal case where an employee was laid off by the employer without a contractual basis, leading to a determination of constructive dismissal under common law principles. The court also addressed the incorporation of Employment Standards Act (ESA) provisions into the employment contract and the sufficiency of pleadings in civil procedure.
Bevilacqua v Gracious Living Corporation
2016 ONSC 4127 (CanLII) · 2016-06-22Constructive Dismissal: Temporary Layoff Without Contractual Provision
A constructive dismissal case where an employer unilaterally imposed a temporary layoff without a contractual provision, leading to a dispute over the notice period and mitigation of damages. The court ruled that a temporary layoff without authorization constitutes constructive dismissal and determined the appropriate notice period.
Michalski v Cima Canada Inc.
2016 ONSC 1925 (CanLII) · 2016-03-18Constructive Dismissal: Temporary Layoff Without Contractual Basis
A constructive dismissal case involving a temporary layoff without contractual authorization, which the court ruled constituted constructive dismissal. The case also addressed the appropriate notice period and damages, as well as the set-off of statutory severance payments against common law damages.
Trites v. Renin Corp
2013 ONSC 2715 (CanLII) · 2013-05-07Constructive Dismissal: Temporary Layoff and Reasonable Notice
A constructive dismissal case where an employee was awarded 33 weeks of notice and damages for a temporary layoff that did not comply with the Employment Standards Act. The court addressed whether a unilateral temporary layoff constitutes constructive dismissal and the interaction between common law and the ESA.
Salazar v. Murt Canada Inc.
2006 CanLII 9983 (ON SC) · 2006-03-31Wrongful Dismissal: Employee on Layoff Awarded 8-Month Notice Period
A wrongful dismissal case involving a plaintiff on temporary layoff at the time of a business sale. The court determined the plaintiff became an employee of the purchaser corporation and was entitled to $6,600.72 under the Employment Standards Act and $5,749.28 in common law damages for an eight-month notice period. Wallace damages were not awarded due to lack of evidence of bad faith.
Deschenes v. Little Employment Group Inc.
2003 CanLII 7172 (ON SC) · 2003-11-10Constructive Dismissal: Temporary Layoff Without Contract Terms
A constructive dismissal case where the plaintiff was subjected to a temporary layoff without any express or implied contractual terms permitting layoffs. The court determined that the layoff constituted constructive dismissal as no policy or practice of layoffs was established. The case also addresses the reasonable notice period for a plaintiff who had been employed for 28 months under a new employment contract and whether a car allowance is payable during the notice period.