Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Heller v. Uber: Class Action on Employment Misclassification
Summary
This is an interlocutory proceeding concerning the certification of a class action against Uber Technologies Inc. regarding the misclassification of employment status. The court addressed disputes over the content and distribution of the class notice, including the use of app notifications and specific language clarifying the implications of opting in or out, to ensure informed decision-making by class members. The court also exercised its discretion to apportion the costs of the notice plan between the plaintiffs and defendants.
Outcome
Court approved additional notice language and apportioned costs 33:67 (plaintiffs:defendants)
Award
Costs of the Notice Plan apportioned 33:67 between plaintiffs and defendants
Key Factors
- misclassification of employment status
- class action certification
- notice plan content
- costs apportionment
- independent contractor vs employee
Related Cases
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.
2026 ONSC 4102 (CanLII) · 2026-07-14Heller v. Uber: Class Action Discovery Ruling
This is an interlocutory procedural decision within a class action lawsuit concerning the employment status of Uber drivers. The court addressed motions regarding the discovery of class members, specifically granting leave to examine ten additional class members and determining the parameters for these examinations to ensure relevance to common issues.
Williams v. Enbridge Gas Inc.
2026 ONSC 3321 (CanLII) · 2026-06-04Class Action Settlement Approval: Unionised Employees
This is a procedural ruling regarding the approval of a class action settlement and associated costs. The court applied the Parsons factors to determine if the settlement, which included a 75 percent recovery and cy près distribution, was fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the class, noting risks related to limitation defences and the presence of unionised employees. The court also approved counsel's contingency fees using the percentage fee approach and refused an honorarium to the representative plaintiff due to a lack of exceptional circumstances.
Chiang v. The Toronto Dominion Bank
2026 ONSC 2013 (CanLII) · 2026-04-10Class Action Certification: Systemic Pay Practices
This is a certification motion in a class action lawsuit against an employer regarding systemic pay practices. The court certified the action, finding that claims in contract, negligence, fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment disclosed causes of action and that common issues predominated. Aggregate damages were certified, but punitive damages were refused due to a lack of basis in fact.
Deacon v. Bank of Nova Scotia
2026 ONSC 1793 (CanLII) · 2026-03-31Class Action: Bank of Nova Scotia Vacation Pay Certification
This is a certification motion in a class action lawsuit brought by Home Financing Advisors against the Bank of Nova Scotia regarding employment standards compliance under the Canada Labour Code. The court addressed whether common issues existed concerning the calculation of vacation and statutory holiday pay, specifically whether the bank's disclosure methods were confusing under the Kinch test. The motion also considered expert evidence admissibility and limitation periods for accrued entitlements. Certification was granted for the proposed class.
Egan v. National Research Council of Canada
2026 ONSC 1429 (CanLII) · 2026-03-09Class Action: Punitive Damages for PFAS Contamination
This is a procedural decision regarding a class action certification order and a motion to amend pleadings to add punitive damages. The court granted leave to amend the Statement of Claim to include punitive damages based on the alleged failure to warn of PFAS contamination, finding a reasonable prospect of success under the Whiten standard. The court also amended the certification order to include punitive damages as a common issue and denied the defendant's cross-motion to strike.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.