Imperial Oil Ltd. v. Entrop
Human Rights Employment: Alcohol Policy and Disability Discrimination
Summary
A human rights employment case involving Imperial Oil's alcohol and drug policy and its potential discrimination against employees with disabilities or perceived disabilities. The court examined whether the policy violated sections 5 and 17 of the Ontario Human Rights Code and whether the employer properly justified the policy as reasonably necessary and accommodated employees to the point of undue hardship.
Key Factors
- discrimination in employment
- human rights code
- disability and perceived disability
- alcohol and drug policy
- reasonable accommodation
Related Cases
Cespedes v. University of Toronto (No. 2)
2004 CanLII 94529 (ON SC) · 2004-03-26Human Rights Employment: Costs Entitlement Dispute at University of Toronto
A human rights employment case involving a dispute over costs entitlement following a human rights complaint against the University of Toronto.
York Advertising Ltd. v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission)
2004 CanLII 58230 (ON SC) · 2004-03-11Human Rights Tribunal Review: Non-Parties Challenge Procedural Fairness
A judicial review case concerning a human rights tribunal decision that found gender-based discrimination and harassment in the workplace. The applicants, who were not parties to the hearing, argue they have standing to seek judicial review due to procedural unfairness and potential reputational and financial harm. The court is considering whether urgency justifies a single judge hearing and whether interim relief should be granted to prevent further dissemination of the tribunal’s decision.
Campbell v. Ontario (Human Rights Comm.)
2004 CanLII 94528 (ON SC) · 2004-02-02Human Rights Employment: Fairness in Commission Investigation
A case involving the fairness of an investigation conducted by the Human Rights Commission in Ontario, likely related to an employment-related human rights complaint. The case addresses procedural fairness in the investigation and may involve judicial review of the Commission's actions.
Jones v. Amway of Canada Ltd.
2002 CanLII 78246 (ON SC) · 2002-04-19Human Rights Employment: Termination Reprisal Under Ontario Code
A human rights employment case where the plaintiff alleged that their termination constituted reprisal under section 8 of the Ontario Human Rights Code. The Board of Inquiry found no reprisal, and the court upheld this decision as reasonable, applying the standards of review to the Board's factual and legal findings.
Pritchard v. Ontario (Human Rights Comm.) (No. 5)
2002 CanLII 78247 (ON SC) · 2002-01-02Human Rights Employment Case: Sex Discrimination Claim
A human rights case involving allegations of sex discrimination. The case was heard in the context of employment-related discrimination.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Ontario Severance is an educational tool. If you are facing a serious employment law matter, consult with a qualified employment lawyer in Ontario.