Arbitration Clauses — Ontario Employment Law
Related Keywords
About Arbitration Clauses
When starting a new job in Ontario, you might encounter an 'arbitration clause' in your employment contract. But what does it mean? In simple terms, it's a contractual term that requires you to resolve certain legal disputes with your employer through a private process called arbitration, rather than through the public court system. Employers often favour these clauses to keep disputes confidential, potentially speed up resolutions, and, in some cases, prevent employees from joining together in class-action lawsuits.
However, signing a contract with an arbitration clause does not mean you've signed away all your rights. The enforceability of these clauses in Ontario is a complex and evolving area of law. A pivotal moment was the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller. The Court ruled that an arbitration clause can be deemed 'unconscionable'—and therefore invalid—if it is grossly unfair. This can happen when there is a significant inequality of bargaining power and the resulting agreement is improvident. For example, a clause requiring an Ontario employee to pay thousands of dollars to start an arbitration process in another country could be found unenforceable.
Crucially, an arbitration clause cannot prevent you from accessing your minimum statutory rights. You always retain the right to file a complaint with the Ontario Ministry of Labour for violations of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), such as unpaid wages, overtime, or termination pay, regardless of what your contract says. The clause may, however, apply to 'common law' claims like wrongful dismissal for additional notice or damages. Because the specific wording of the clause and the circumstances of your employment are critical, understanding your position requires a careful analysis of your unique situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an arbitration clause in an Ontario employment contract?
An arbitration clause is a section in your employment contract that states that if a dispute arises between you and your employer (like a wrongful dismissal claim), it must be resolved through a private arbitrator instead of going to court.
Can my employer use an arbitration clause to stop me from claiming unpaid overtime?
No. An arbitration clause cannot prevent you from filing a claim with the Ministry of Labour for your minimum entitlements under the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA), which includes overtime pay, vacation pay, and termination pay.
I signed a contract with an arbitration clause. Does this mean I can never sue my employer in court?
Not necessarily. An Ontario court can refuse to enforce an arbitration clause if it is found to be unconscionable, unclear, or if it attempts to illegally contract out of a statutory protection. The validity of the clause is highly fact-specific.
What makes an arbitration clause 'unconscionable' and invalid?
A clause may be unconscionable if there's a significant power imbalance between you and the employer and the terms are grossly unfair. Factors include prohibitive costs to start arbitration, an inconvenient location for the hearing, or terms that heavily favour the employer.
Is an arbitration clause the same as the grievance process in a union?
No. Grievance arbitration is a mandatory dispute resolution process for unionized workplaces governed by a collective agreement and the Labour Relations Act. An arbitration clause is a term in an individual employment contract for non-union employees.
How long do I have to challenge an arbitration clause?
There isn't a specific deadline to challenge the clause itself, but strict deadlines apply to the underlying legal issue. For example, you generally have two years from the date of a wrongful dismissal to start a legal action, and it is in that action that the employer would try to enforce the clause.
When should I get a lawyer to review an arbitration clause?
The best time is before you sign the employment contract. If a dispute has already occurred and your employer is pointing to the clause, it is essential to have an employment lawyer assess its enforceability before you agree to arbitrate.
Common Scenarios
- A tech startup includes a clause in its offer letters requiring all disputes, including termination and equity disagreements, to be resolved by a private arbitrator in Delaware.
- A group of gig-economy couriers want to launch a class-action lawsuit for employee misclassification, but their service agreement contains a clause forcing all claims into individual arbitration.
- A senior executive is terminated and believes she is owed significant severance, but her employment contract contains a 'Dispute Resolution' section that mandates binding arbitration.
- An employee in a dispute over unpaid commissions is told by HR that he cannot sue the company in Small Claims Court because his employment agreement requires arbitration.
What You Should Know
- Before signing any employment contract, carefully read sections titled 'Arbitration' or 'Dispute Resolution'. If you don't understand the implications, seek clarity before you agree.
- Remember that you cannot be forced to arbitrate claims for your minimum entitlements under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. You always have the right to file a claim with the Ministry of Labour.
- Do not automatically assume an arbitration clause is valid. Ontario courts, following guidance from the Supreme Court, are protective of employees and will strike down unfair or unconscionable clauses.
- If you are terminated and your employer tries to enforce an arbitration clause, it's critical to consult with an employment lawyer immediately to understand your options and the clause's potential validity.
- Keep a secure copy of your signed employment contract. It is the primary document that will be analyzed to determine if a dispute must be arbitrated or can proceed in court.
Featured Cases
Nohdomi v. Callidus Capital Corporation
2023 ONSC 4469 (CanLII) · 2023-08-11Employment Standards: Termination Provisions and Arbitration Clause Validity
A contract law dispute involving employment standards, focusing on the validity of termination provisions and an arbitration clause under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. The case likely addresses the enforceability of these clauses in the context of employment termination.
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.
2023 ONSC 1942 (CanLII) · 2023-03-27Uber Class Action: Employment Relationship and Arbitration Clause
A class action case where plaintiffs alleged they were employees of Uber and sought to challenge the enforceability of the Class Action Waiver and Arbitration Clause in Uber’s Service Agreements. The court determined whether the relationship between the parties is governed by employment law and whether the claims were statute-barred under the two-year limitation period.
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.
2018 ONSC 718 (CanLII) · 2018-01-30Uber Class Action: Arbitration Clauses and Employment Standards
A class action case where Uber drivers alleged they were employees entitled to Employment Standards Act protections. The court ruled that arbitration clauses did not violate public policy and that the International Commercial Arbitration Act applied. The court also upheld the arbitrator's jurisdiction to determine their own competence.
Morrison v Ericsson Canada
2016 ONSC 3908 (CanLII) · 2016-06-21Wrongful Dismissal: Arbitration Clause Upheld in Employment Contract
A wrongful dismissal case involving an employment contract with an arbitration clause. The plaintiff resigned and commenced an action in Ontario for unpaid commissions and wrongful dismissal damages. The defendant sought to stay the Ontario action and enforce the arbitration clause, which was upheld by the court.
Patel v. Kanbay International Inc.
2008 CanLII 21222 (ON SC) · 2008-04-22Wrongful Dismissal and Misrepresentation: Arbitration Clause Dispute in Employment Case
A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff alleged negligent misrepresentation by the defendants regarding equity ownership in the company, inducing him to accept employment. The defendants sought to stay the claims related to shares, arguing they were subject to arbitration. The court considered whether the claims should proceed in court or arbitration, and whether Ontario courts had jurisdiction to hear the employment-related claims.
Engels v. Merit
2008 CanLII 6642 (ON SC) · 2008-02-25Wrongful Dismissal: Employment Status Dispute Requiring Trial
A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff claimed an employment relationship, while the defendant argued the plaintiff was an independent contractor. The court found that there was a genuine issue regarding the employment status, requiring a trial to weigh conflicting evidence.
Lansens v. Onbelay Automotive Coatings Corp.
2006 CanLII 51177 (ON SC) · 2006-08-11Wrongful Dismissal and Defamation: Arbitration Clause Not Applicable to Employment Claims
A wrongful dismissal and defamation case where the plaintiff alleged misconduct by the employer and its officer. The defendants sought to stay the claims and refer them to arbitration under a Share Purchase Agreement, but the court ruled that the arbitration clause did not apply to the employment-related claims, which were to be resolved in Ontario courts.
Ross v. Christian & Timbers Inc.
2002 CanLII 49619 (ON SC) · 2002-04-30Wrongful Dismissal Case Involving Arbitration Clause Under Ohio Law
A wrongful dismissal action brought in Ontario where the defendant sought a stay of proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1991, based on an arbitration clause requiring disputes to be resolved under Ohio law. The court considered whether the arbitration clause contravened Ontario public policy or the Employment Standards Act and whether the employment agreement was valid despite the plaintiff not signing it.
Bourne v. Otis Elevator Co. Ltd.
1984 CanLII 5823 (ON SC) · 1984-03-07Wrongful Dismissal and Collective Agreements: Court Jurisdiction and Severance Pay
A wrongful dismissal case involving an employee covered by a collective agreement who brought a claim in court despite an arbitration clause. The case examines whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the claim under the Labour Relations Act and whether the employee can claim severance pay when the collective agreement does not explicitly address it.
Raymond v. Adrema Limited et al.
1962 CanLII 225 (ON SC) · 1962-12-21Wrongful Dismissal and Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts
A wrongful dismissal case involving an employment contract with an arbitration clause. The court considered whether disputes involving mixed legal and factual issues, such as wrongful dismissal, should proceed to arbitration or be resolved in court, focusing on the court's discretion to allow litigation when legal issues predominate.
Raymond v. Adrema Ltd. and Farrington-Bradma Ltd.
1962 CanLII 117 (ON SC) · 1962-04-02Wrongful Dismissal and Jurisdiction: Employment Contract Dispute with Foreign Defendant
A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff was dismissed and issued a writ against a foreign defendant for unpaid commissions and wrongful dismissal. The employment contract was executed in England but partially performed in Ontario, raising jurisdictional issues. The court held that the breach of contract in Ontario was sufficient to establish jurisdiction and that the foreign defendant's unconditional appearance waived the right to object to jurisdiction.