Non-Competition Clauses — Ontario Employment Law

45 casesDecisions from 1975–2025

About Non-Competition Clauses

A non-competition clause, sometimes called a non-compete agreement, is a term in an employment contract that attempts to restrict an employee from working for a competitor or starting a competing business after their employment ends. For many years, these clauses were common in Ontario workplaces, but their enforceability has always been questionable. Courts in Ontario have traditionally viewed non-competes as a restraint of trade, running contrary to the public policy that individuals should be free to earn a livelihood in their chosen field.

This judicial skepticism was codified into law with a major change to Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA). As of October 25, 2021, the ESA explicitly prohibits employers from entering into employment contracts that contain a non-competition clause. This ban applies to the vast majority of employees in the province, regardless of their role or industry. However, the legislation includes two key exceptions: the ban does not apply to certain high-level executives (often referred to as the 'C-suite'), nor does it apply in the context of the sale of a business where the seller becomes an employee of the purchaser. For agreements entered into before this date, or for roles that fall into an exception, the old common law rules still apply. Under those rules, a non-compete clause is presumed to be unenforceable unless the employer can prove it is 'reasonable' in its scope. This means the restriction must be narrowly tailored in terms of duration (how long), geographic area, and the specific activities it prohibits. It must also be necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, such as trade secrets, and not simply to prevent ordinary competition. Because the legal analysis of any restrictive covenant is highly dependent on its specific wording and the factual circumstances, understanding your rights by reviewing the contract with a professional is often a critical step.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is my non-compete clause legal in Ontario?

For most employees, if your employment contract was entered into on or after October 25, 2021, the non-compete clause is illegal and void under the Employment Standards Act, 2000. There are narrow exceptions for certain executives and in the context of a sale of a business.

What is the difference between a non-competition and a non-solicitation clause?

A non-competition clause prevents you from working for a competitor. A non-solicitation clause is less restrictive; it only prevents you from actively trying to take clients, customers, or employees from your former employer. Courts are more likely to enforce a reasonable non-solicitation clause.

My employer wants me to sign a new contract with a non-compete. Do I have to?

For most employees, your employer is prohibited by the ESA from requiring you to sign a non-compete. If you fall into an exception (e.g., you are a C-level executive), the employer must provide you with something new of value (like a raise or bonus) in exchange for signing, otherwise it may be unenforceable.

What happens if I just ignore my non-compete clause?

Even if a non-compete is likely unenforceable, your former employer could still try to sue you to stop you from working for a competitor (an injunction). This would force you to incur legal costs to defend yourself, so it's risky to simply ignore it without getting a legal opinion first.

I signed my non-compete agreement in 2020. Is it affected by the new law?

The ESA ban on non-competes is not retroactive, so it doesn't automatically void clauses signed before October 25, 2021. However, these older clauses are still subject to the very strict common law test and are often found to be unreasonably broad and unenforceable by courts.

When should I get a lawyer to look at a non-competition clause?

You should seek legal advice before you sign any contract containing a non-compete. If you've already signed one, it's crucial to have it reviewed by an employment lawyer after your employment ends and before you start looking for a new job in the same industry.

Common Scenarios

  • A marketing coordinator in Hamilton is laid off and her severance offer includes a new, restrictive 12-month non-compete clause she must sign to receive her payment.
  • A software engineer leaves a tech firm in Waterloo and is reminded by HR of the 2-year, North America-wide non-compete she signed in her 2022 offer letter.
  • The owner of a chain of physiotherapy clinics sells the business and agrees to a 3-year non-compete as part of the sale agreement, preventing him from opening a new clinic within 50km.
  • A senior investment banker, who holds the title of Chief Investment Officer, is negotiating a new employment contract that includes a non-competition clause.
  • A dental hygienist quits her job and her former employer sends a threatening letter, referencing a non-compete in her contract, after learning she has started working at another clinic across the street.

What You Should Know

  • Check the date on your employment agreement. If it's on or after October 25, 2021, any non-compete clause is likely illegal under Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000.
  • Do not assume a non-compete clause is valid just because it's in your contract. The vast majority, even those predating the 2021 ban, are struck down by courts as unreasonable.
  • Distinguish between non-competition and non-solicitation. While a non-compete is likely void, a clause preventing you from poaching former clients or colleagues may still be enforceable.
  • If your former employer threatens legal action over a non-compete, do not ignore it. Seek immediate legal advice to understand your risks and formulate a response.
  • Before accepting a job with a competitor, have an employment lawyer review your old contract to assess the risk of your former employer attempting to enforce a non-compete clause.

Featured Cases

Riva Plumbing Limited v. Ferrari

2025 ONSC 3219 (CanLII) · 2025-05-29

Employment Contract Dispute: Pro-Rated Bonuses Awarded

A case involving former employees of a plumbing business who were accused of breaching fiduciary duties and non-competition clauses. The court ruled that there was no breach of duties as the employees did not compete during their employment or misuse confidential information. Additionally, the court determined that the employees were entitled to pro-rated bonuses under oral agreements despite resigning before the fiscal year-end.

bonuses employment contract fiduciary duties non-competition clauses

Giacomodonato v PearTree Securities Inc.

2023 ONSC 3197 (CanLII) · 2023-05-29

Employment Contract Dispute: Enforceability, Wrongful Dismissal, and Punitive Damages

A case involving the enforceability and breach of employment contracts, wrongful dismissal, and punitive damages for abusive conduct. The court found the second employment contract enforceable, awarded salary continuance and variable compensation, and ruled non-competition clauses unenforceable. The employer was also found to have breached the contract and was ordered to pay punitive damages.

contract interpretation employment contract enforceability non-competition clauses wrongful dismissal

Stress-Crete Limited v. Harriman

2019 ONSC 2773 (CanLII) · 2019-05-06

Restrictive Covenants in Employment Agreements: Breach and Injunctions

A court case regarding the enforcement of restrictive covenants in an employment agreement. The dispute centers on whether the respondent breached non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions and whether injunctive relief is warranted. The court applies the RJR-MacDonald test and Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers to determine the reasonableness and enforceability of the restrictive covenants.

injunction labour and employment non-competition clauses restrictive covenants

Berkeley v. Miller

2018 ONSC 3645 (CanLII) · 2018-06-13

Non-competition Clauses: Court Denies Injunction in Employment Contract Dispute

A case where the plaintiff sought an injunction to enforce non-competition and confidentiality clauses against former employees and their new employer. The court found the non-competition clauses overly broad and unenforceable, and limited breaches of confidentiality were not deemed to cause material harm, leading to the denial of the injunction.

contracts employment contract non-competition clauses shareholder agreements

Ceridian Dayforce Corporation v. Daniel Wright

2017 ONSC 6763 (CanLII) · 2017-11-20

Non-Compete Clause Enforceability: Partial Summary Judgment Granted

A court case involving the enforceability of a non-compete clause in an employment agreement. The clause was deemed overly broad and unenforceable, and partial summary judgment was granted to the defendants. The court also considered the proportionality of summary judgment and the protection of trade secrets.

contracts employment contract enforceability non-competition clauses

Nemirovski v. Socast Inc.

2017 ONSC 5616 (CanLII) · 2017-08-17

Wrongful Dismissal: 19-Month Employee Awarded Notice and Costs

A wrongful dismissal case where the plaintiff was terminated without cause after 19 months of service. The court granted summary judgment, awarded nine months' notice plus benefits, and considered factors such as the Employment Standards Act, non-competition clause enforceability, and the plaintiff's mitigation efforts. The court also awarded substantial indemnity costs to the plaintiff.

employment standards act non-competition clauses reasonable notice summary judgment wrongful dismissal

United Rentals of Canada Inc. v Brooks

2016 ONSC 6854 (CanLII) · 2016-11-09

Employment Agreement Enforceability: Lack of Consideration and Duress

A court case examining the enforceability of an employment agreement, including non-competition clauses, where the defendant signed without additional consideration and under duress. The court found the agreement unenforceable due to lack of valid consideration and unreasonable terms.

contracts employment contract enforceability non-competition clauses

Cassell v. Irving H. Miller Limited

2016 ONSC 5570 (CanLII) · 2016-09-13

Wrongful Dismissal: Insurance Broker's 15 Months Notice and Damages Awarded

A wrongful dismissal case involving an insurance broker dismissed for alleged dishonesty and breach of duties. The court applied the McKinley v. BC Tel framework to determine just cause and awarded 15 months' notice based on Bardal factors. The case also addressed the breach of a non-competition clause and fiduciary duty, with the employer winning damages for lost commissions. The court also dismissed claims of conspiracy, intimidation, and slander.

fiduciary duties just cause non-competition clauses reasonable notice wrongful dismissal

BlackBerry Limited v. Marineau-Mes

2014 ONSC 1790 (CanLII) · 2014-03-24

Employment Contract Validity: Six-Month Notice and Vacation Pay

A court ruled that an employment contract between BlackBerry Limited and Marineau-Mes was valid and enforceable, with a six-month notice period deemed reasonable. The court also found no violation of the Employment Standards Act regarding vacation pay and no 'Good Reason' for termination.

contracts employment contract employment standards act non-competition clauses validity and enforceability

Portable Packaging Systems Inc. v. Brackin

2011 ONSC 4440 (CanLII) · 2011-07-19

Restrictive Covenants in Employment Contracts: Breach and Damages

A former employee joined a competitor within the restricted period of an employment contract, leading to an application for injunctive relief and damages. The court considered the enforceability of the restrictive covenants and the appropriate measure of damages.

contracts employment contract non-competition clauses restrictive covenants

Bonazza v. Forensic Investigations Canada Inc.

2009 CanLII 32268 (ON SC) · 2009-06-23

Employment Contract Dispute: Non-Competition Clause Ambiguity and Fiduciary Obligations

An employment contract dispute involving the enforceability of a non-competition clause and fiduciary obligations. The court examined whether the arbitrator erred in law by finding the restrictive covenant enforceable, and whether fiduciary duties independently required non-competition. The restrictive covenant was found unenforceable due to ambiguity, and the constructive dismissal claim was dismissed due to lack of evidence.

constructive dismissal employment contract fiduciary obligations non-competition clauses restrictive covenants

Islip v. SSI Equipment Inc.

2009 CanLII 32704 (ON SC) · 2009-06-19

Employment Contract Dispute: Bonuses and Breach of Non-Competition Clauses

An employment contract dispute involving the Islip family and SSI Equipment Inc., where the court examined breaches of non-disclosure and non-competition clauses, entitlement to bonuses, and the application of contractual remedies. The court found that the Islip family was entitled to bonuses despite breaches of contract and denied punitive damages.

bonus entitlement breach of contract contract interpretation employment contract non-competition clauses

Schofield v. Schofield

2007 CanLII 48661 (ON SC) · 2007-11-13

Enforceability of Non-Competition Clause in Employment Agreement

A case involving the enforceability of a non-competition clause in an employment agreement during the sale of a business. The court considered the reasonableness of the clause's scope and applied the RJR-MacDonald test. The case also included allegations of misuse of confidential information and the granting of an injunction to prevent its disclosure.

confidential information employment contract injunction non-competition clauses restrictive covenants

Sherwood Dash Inc. v. Woodview Products Inc.

2005 CanLII 45978 (ON SC) · 2005-12-08

Enforceability of Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Contracts

A case involving the enforcement of non-competition clauses in employment agreements, with the plaintiff seeking to reinstate an interlocutory injunction against former employees. The court considered the test for granting interlocutory injunctions, the enforceability of restrictive covenants, and whether the plaintiff met the disclosure standard under Rule 39.01(6).

employment contract enforceability interlocutory injunction non-competition clauses restrictive covenants

IT/Net Inc. v. Doucette

2005 CanLII 18412 (ON SC) · 2005-03-22

Non-Competition Clause Enforceability in Employment Contract Dispute

A case involving a dispute over the enforceability of non-competition and confidentiality provisions in an employment contract. The court found the non-competition clause unenforceable due to lack of clarity and overbreadth, and no breach of fiduciary or common law duties was established.

breach of contract confidentiality provisions employment agreements enforceability non-competition clauses

Robert Half Canada Inc. v. Jeewan

2004 CanLII 1532 (ON SC) · 2004-03-05

Non-Competition Clause Injunction: Without-Notice Motion in Employment Dispute

A labour and employment case involving a plaintiff seeking an interim injunction without notice to restrain former employees from competing or soliciting. The court examined whether the plaintiff was justified in proceeding without notice and whether the injunction should be extended, considering the rules on without-notice motions and the duty of full and frank disclosure.

breach of fiduciary duty employment contract interim injunction non-competition clauses without-notice motions

IT/Net Inc. v. Cameron

2003 CanLII 10653 (ON SC) · 2003-10-28

Employment Contract Dispute: Breach of Non-Competition Clauses and Misrepresentation

An employment contract dispute involving misrepresentation and breach of restrictive covenants. The defendant left prior employment based on assurances of a one-year contract, which the plaintiff misrepresented. The defendant also allegedly breached confidentiality and non-competition clauses by assisting a competitor in securing a client contract. The court awarded damages for loss of profits but dismissed the counterclaim for negligent misrepresentation due to lack of proven loss.

breach of contract damages employment contract misrepresentation non-competition clauses

Industrial Rush Supply & Service Ltd. v. Faria

2003 CanLII 5657 (ON SC) · 2003-02-18

Wrongful Dismissal and Restrictive Covenant Enforceability in Employment Agreements

A wrongful dismissal case involving the enforceability of restrictive covenants in employment and business sale agreements. The court examined whether termination without cause precludes enforcement of non-competition and non-solicitation clauses, and whether the covenants were reasonable in scope and duration.

employment agreements enforceability non-competition clauses restrictive covenants wrongful dismissal

Kohler Canada Co. v. Porter

2002 CanLII 49614 (ON SC) · 2002-06-12

Non-Competition Clause Enforceability: 13-Year Employee's Employment Agreement Dispute

A case involving the enforceability of a non-competition clause in an employment agreement, where the employer sought to enforce the clause against a former employee who joined a competitor. The employee signed the agreement after 13 years of employment, and the employer argued continued employment constituted consideration. The court found that continued employment alone was insufficient consideration unless accompanied by additional value or forbearance from termination. Evidence also failed to establish breaches of non-competition or solicitation clauses.

breach of employment agreement consideration for employment agreements employment contract enforceability of restrictive covenants non-competition clauses

Madison Chemical Industries Ltd. v. Walker

2000 CanLII 22606 (ON SC) · 2000-03-21

Employment Contract: Enforceability of Non-Competition Clause and Share Valuation

A case involving the enforceability of non-competition and non-solicitation clauses in an employment agreement, as well as a breach of fiduciary duty and contractual obligations by an employee. The court found no damages caused by the employee’s actions and addressed issues related to the employee’s status as a minority shareholder and the valuation of shares.

breach of fiduciary duty employment contract non-competition clauses restrictive covenants share valuation